Live data from Hacker News

A search engine that favors text-heavy sites and punishes modern web design

search.marginalia.nu

61–70 of 735 posts

Re: A search engine that favors text-heavy sites and punishes modern web design

#61
post #46

Yeah so this is my project. It's very much a work in progress, but occasionally I think it works remarkably well for something I cobbled together alone out of consumer hardware and home-made code :-)

Love it, kudos! This is great for developers and others who Just Need Answers and not shopping or entertainment. If you're looking for feedback, both from a UI design and utility standpoint, you might consider "inlining" results from selected sites, e.g. Wikipedia, stacked change, etc. Having worked on search for a long time, inlining (onebox etc) is a big reason users choose Google, and that channelers fail to get t…

If Google starts showing interesting text-heavy links instead of vapid listicles and storefronts, I have accomplished everything I ever could dream of.

Re: A search engine that favors text-heavy sites and punishes modern web design

#63

Yeah so this is my project. It's very much a work in progress, but occasionally I think it works remarkably well for something I cobbled together alone out of consumer hardware and home-made code :-)

I love this, and I love (many of) the results so far! What I can't find on the site is detail about what "too many modern web design features" means. Is it just penalizing sites with tons of JavaScript?

Javascript tags are penalized the hardest, but it also takes into consideration density of text per HTML. There's also some adjustments based on text length, which words occur in the page, etc.

Re: A search engine that favors text-heavy sites and punishes modern web design

#66
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How did you go about seeding your web crawler with URLs to crawl?

Not OP, but if I was to do this, I'd start by downloading Wikipedia and all its external links and references, and crawling from there. You should eventually reach most of the publicly visible internet.

I feel a little embarrassed that I didn't think of something like that.

When I did some crawler experimenting in my younger years, I thought I was pretty clever using sites that would let you perform a random Google searches. I would just crawl all the pages from the results returned.

Your method would undoubtedly be more interesting I think. It would certainly lead to interesting performance problems quicker, I bet.

Re: A search engine that favors text-heavy sites and punishes modern web design

#68
post #50

Fascinating. I studied an "obscure" group of insects. My go-to search term to test an engine is their family name as it is a rarely used word and I know most (all?) of the major data sources that have accumulated data on it. When Wolfram Alpha added species names, I checked with the name, boring, Duck Duck, boring, Google (well we know Google isn't for search anymore, it's absolutely horrible) boring, Bing, boring...…

I'm intrigued by this experiment but I can't visualize it. What do you mean by boring results? Would combing through a library (the one with paper books) also produce boring results? What's your ideal results?

There’s certain grey literature that’s not captured in university library federated searches nor easily found with mainstream search engines.

Re: A search engine that favors text-heavy sites and punishes modern web design

#70
post #50

Fascinating. I studied an "obscure" group of insects. My go-to search term to test an engine is their family name as it is a rarely used word and I know most (all?) of the major data sources that have accumulated data on it. When Wolfram Alpha added species names, I checked with the name, boring, Duck Duck, boring, Google (well we know Google isn't for search anymore, it's absolutely horrible) boring, Bing, boring...…

> well we know Google isn't for search anymore

Do you suggest anything better? As far as I can tell, all the other search engines are either repackaged Bing (ie: DuckDuck), or are just as bad.

Post reply on HN