Live data from Hacker News

Visa Buys CryptoPunk #7610

twitter.com

61–70 of 138 posts

Re: Visa Buys CryptoPunk #7610

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not only is this a small sum of money for Visa to throw away, this is a small sum of money for an NFT collector to throw away. To me most criticism of NFTs is reminiscent of criticisms of modern art. Very few understand the scope of what "non fungible token" means. There are PLENTY of use-cases for a publicly verifiable token issued by a 3rd party and owned by you, other than art, if you just use a little imagination…

We already have (digital) ownership that can be publically verified.

Absent a trusted third-party? Please show us.

Re: Visa Buys CryptoPunk #7610

#62
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mind sharing just one?

ENS is a DNS alternative that is not controlled by ICANN, where ownership of a name is effectively an NFT. Why might you want that? See https://www.eff.org/issues/icann

Not to mention that IP address blocks are effectively the original NFT.

Re: Visa Buys CryptoPunk #7610

#63
post #45
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

how is a NFT any more arbitrary than a hallmark card? both are "artistic" to a certain degree, completely useless after the purchase and initial exchange.

The NFT is sold under the false pretence that is somehow connected with some object of art, when in fact there isn't any such connection. This is what makes NFTs a scam.

https://vitalik.ca/general/2021/03/23/legitimacy.html

"Legitimacy is a pattern of higher-order acceptance. An outcome in some social context is legitimate if the people in that social context broadly accept and play their part in enacting that outcome, and each individual person does so because they expect everyone else to do the same."

Re: Visa Buys CryptoPunk #7610

#64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not only is this a small sum of money for Visa to throw away, this is a small sum of money for an NFT collector to throw away. To me most criticism of NFTs is reminiscent of criticisms of modern art. Very few understand the scope of what "non fungible token" means. There are PLENTY of use-cases for a publicly verifiable token issued by a 3rd party and owned by you, other than art, if you just use a little imagination…

Mind sharing just one?

PAXG, each token is a claim to one physical ounce of gold, held by the issuer. Issued by a fully regulated NYC based financial institution.

Re: Visa Buys CryptoPunk #7610

#65
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The NFT is sold under the false pretence that is somehow connected with some object of art, when in fact there isn't any such connection. This is what makes NFTs a scam.

Yeah, when I realized you don't actually "own" it through any licenses it made me sour on the whole idea. Is there a reason why people couldn't be granted a license to do whatever they wanted with an NFT? Seems kind of arbitrary to do so, but I'm sure there's a reason why it's like that.

I believe all NFTs should be in public domain, in the same spirit as open-source.

recent NFT projects like Nouns[1] and many others have taken this approach!

[1] https://nouns.wtf

Re: Visa Buys CryptoPunk #7610

#66
post #56
post #15

Well, congratulations to those NFT scammers, it finally paid off. They got their Whale. The entire game of pumping up NFTs to try and pass them off as a useful tool that'll see widespread adoption has finally paid out. This is a small sum of money for Visa to throw away, but this creates a fantastic permission structure for unsophisticated investors to throw away their life savings on a set of worthless e-certificate…

It's interesting to me, I've never bought a single crypto thing of any type but I look at the speed it's developing and popularity and it reminds me of the internet circa early 2000's when things were moving fast. The internet nowadays is a bit stale by comparison, crypto seems to be where the action and energy is.

Absolutely it is. I turned $2000 into $200,000 in NFTs this summer and its just the beginning. It definitely has a Web 2.0 feel

Re: Visa Buys CryptoPunk #7610

#67
post #15

Well, congratulations to those NFT scammers, it finally paid off. They got their Whale. The entire game of pumping up NFTs to try and pass them off as a useful tool that'll see widespread adoption has finally paid out. This is a small sum of money for Visa to throw away, but this creates a fantastic permission structure for unsophisticated investors to throw away their life savings on a set of worthless e-certificate…

Might as well mint that comment and call it Old Man Yelling At Clouds #840544564.

Re: Visa Buys CryptoPunk #7610

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mind sharing just one?

PAXG, each token is a claim to one physical ounce of gold, held by the issuer. Issued by a fully regulated NYC based financial institution.

What happens when the token is lost or destroyed? Is that the only way to claim ownership?

Re: Visa Buys CryptoPunk #7610

#69
post #15

Well, congratulations to those NFT scammers, it finally paid off. They got their Whale. The entire game of pumping up NFTs to try and pass them off as a useful tool that'll see widespread adoption has finally paid out. This is a small sum of money for Visa to throw away, but this creates a fantastic permission structure for unsophisticated investors to throw away their life savings on a set of worthless e-certificate…

The scammers are skilled at washtrading the prices high and getting attention on social media. Lots of standard salesman/con artist tricks to get people to fomo buy in

But that’s basically all of crypto. The trick is to get out early /s.
Post reply on HN