Live data from Hacker News

Netflix announces Space X documentary on civilian mission into orbit

news.sky.com

61–66 of 66 posts

Re: Netflix announces Space X documentary on civilian mission into orbit

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> When was the last time a crew that orbited earth were all first timers? Shenzhou 7 in September 2008. The Russians did it last in April (launch) and October (landing) 2008, while for the US you have to go back all the way to the second Shuttle flight in 1981.

Awesome stuff, thanks. Totally makes sense why we'd basically always want someone who has done the trip before. I wonder if that was actually the thought process?

>Totally makes sense why we'd basically always want someone who has done the trip before. I wonder if that was actually the thought process?

Yes. Besides the shuttle flight denvercoder9 mentioned,[1] there was one Skylab mission with all-rookie astronauts, and a few Gemini two-man flights. So one shuttle flight out of 135, and about four other NASA missions before that. (Obviously I'm excluding the six Mercury one-man flights that were by definition flown by rookies.) NASA always prefers having the commander (the actual pilot), at least, to have flown in space before. The upcoming Crew-3 is unusual in having a rookie commander, but at least the pilot (i.e., copilot) has flown in space before.

This is why NASA has always chosen people with very high-performance aircraft experience as pilot astronauts; it's the best known way to predict beforehand how someone will do at piloting spacecraft, an inherently dangerous and high-stress environment with complex tasks.

Most of the recent news coverage over the "Mercury 13" was nonsense, but especially the stuff about how the women who participated in that endeavor were "trained as NASA astronauts" or "qualified as NASA astronauts". NASA didn't restrict the selection process for the Mercury 7 to exclude women, but to select the best from the US's pool of active-duty military fixed-wing pilots who had graduated from test pilot school. Yes, no women had attended test pilot schools or flew combat military aircraft, but neither did the vast majority of its soldiers, military officers, or even military pilot officers. (Army, too. There has never been a US Army pilot astronaut,[2] and the first Army mission specialists wasn't selected until 1978.)

[1] And even here, Joe Engle was a NASA rookie but had flown to space on the X-15

[2] The most unrealistic part of I Dream of Jeannie is Roger Healey as a 1960s NASA astronaut who is an Army officer

Re: Netflix announces Space X documentary on civilian mission into orbit

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Indeed, even though that has not been that different on the crew rotation flights to ISS. Doug Hurley (iirc - might have been Bob Behnken instead?) got to fly Crew Dragon manually during the first crewed mission "Demo 2" but the spacecraft is meant to bring people where they should be all by itself (and with help from ground control).

The ISS is a special case. That requires a pilot who can take manual control should the docking system go wrong. A stuck jet on approach could shatter the station and so you need someone who can take over and make very fast avoidance decisions. The recent incident with a docked module was a huge reminder of those dangers.

> That requires a pilot who can take manual control should the docking system go wrong.

What would happen if something went wrong with a cargo Dragon? Clearly they don’t have or need someone on board to fly it.

Re: Netflix announces Space X documentary on civilian mission into orbit

#63

Netflix has become an advertisement platform for certain companies/ideologies/people rather than a media streaming platform. Which is a problem because it has no like/comment functionality that can (theoretically) filter false/exaggerated advertisement. On the other hand, which media platform is actually not an advertisement platform? That's a whole another debate.

Netflix is a business. If you think they should be supporting your ideology dream on. They are making good money right now. Netflix earned a net profit of $1,353 million in the second quarter of 2021, which is an 88% improvement over the result a year earlier. Market cap is going to be > $200B. When the tides of user preference change - they will change with them.

I am not looking for a platform to support my ideology, in fact I do not possess any ideology.

I am not talking about Netflix being a successful business either. Being profit driven does not justify false behavior.

Re: Netflix announces Space X documentary on civilian mission into orbit

#64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Netflix is a business. If you think they should be supporting your ideology dream on. They are making good money right now. Netflix earned a net profit of $1,353 million in the second quarter of 2021, which is an 88% improvement over the result a year earlier. Market cap is going to be > $200B. When the tides of user preference change - they will change with them.

I am not looking for a platform to support my ideology, in fact I do not possess any ideology. I am not talking about Netflix being a successful business either. Being profit driven does not justify false behavior.

If you don't believe you have an ideology, you just don't know what ideology means. Your original comment is very ideological in itself.

Re: Netflix announces Space X documentary on civilian mission into orbit

#65
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am not looking for a platform to support my ideology, in fact I do not possess any ideology. I am not talking about Netflix being a successful business either. Being profit driven does not justify false behavior.

If you don't believe you have an ideology, you just don't know what ideology means. Your original comment is very ideological in itself.

Can you please tell me which ideology does criticizing the UI choices or the content strategy of a web streaming platforms belong to?
Post reply on HN