Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this a correct summary of your statements: Because it -might- make things slightly easier for a state actor with nigh-unlimited resources to enact a doomsday scenario, which they might or might not be pursuing, medical researchers should not publish otherwise helpful research?
I think it's great that the Wuhan institute published all their gain of function research. They even said who paid for it. It's a clear trail back to them, but apparently taking any action to acknowledge that this is a bad thing and something fishy might be going on is a completely politicized issue now that apparently gets as many downvotes as arguing about hot button political topics now. What I'm saying is there s…
Gain of function research is simultaneously concerning (aside from bioweapons use, there is also the possibility of deliberate release) and important (to understand how pathogenesis happens and to better combat future pandemics and bioweapons). It, however, has approximately nothing to do with your assertions that A) China is preparing race-targeted pathogens, or B) that publishing a protein folding database does anything significant to assist China with A.
> ... at least be an open and frank discussion of ...
OK, then you need to be open and frank, rather than engaging in these dishonest argument tactics.