Earlier quoted context omitted.
no, the other way around.
Care to explain what you're trying to get at in greater detail?
California Bill to Decriminalize Psychedelics Is Approved by Senate
61–70 of 230 posts
Re: California Bill to Decriminalize Psychedelics Is Approved by Senate
#62Doesn't california have a massive drug problem and literal armies of drug addicts shitting in the streets and harassing families and tax-payers? How will this help?
> Doesn't california have a massive drug problem Good evidence, in Portugal and Oregon, that legalisation eases drug problems. The homeless problem is a result of Californian voters’ housing policy and policing preferences.
Re: California Bill to Decriminalize Psychedelics Is Approved by Senate
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most of the time when people call something "degenerate" it seems like they're making an argument based on the idea that progress depends on self-control and personal sovereignty. Everything I see labeled that way, psychedelics included, has a reputation of being either a cause of loss of self-control or a consequence of lacking self-control. If you want to be in the habit of understanding people who use words like t…
You're trying to reframe the problem around the people who call it out. That's a good way to distract from said problem but not a way to address it. That kind of drug usage is a manifestation of degeneracy, itself part of a bigger cultural trend. Fixing the symptoms (or rather, absorbing them into legality so they seem less noteworthy) won't get rid of the root cause. edit: to respond to greyface- below since I am no…
Re: California Bill to Decriminalize Psychedelics Is Approved by Senate
#64Whenever I have taken psychedelic drugs (mushrooms), or taken cannabis, it has often made me more paranoid. Has there been any research into how psychedelic drugs may fuel conspiracy theories?
David Icke, was he writing or speaking about conspiracy before he encountered psychedelics or after? What about Terence McKenna and his intriguing Timewave Zero nonsense?
Re: California Bill to Decriminalize Psychedelics Is Approved by Senate
#65Doesn't california have a massive drug problem and literal armies of drug addicts shitting in the streets and harassing families and tax-payers? How will this help?
No, the area of the country with the biggest drug problem is Appalachia [1]. California is better than most states in terms of drug overdose deaths. And as others have pointed out, psychedelics aren't really the problematic drugs. [1] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/drug_poisoning_mor...
It is very revealing.
https://twitter.com/ShellenbergerMD/status/13998897983204433...
Re: California Bill to Decriminalize Psychedelics Is Approved by Senate
#66Doesn't california have a massive drug problem and literal armies of drug addicts shitting in the streets and harassing families and tax-payers? How will this help?
If someone is experiencing psychosis they should be guided.
Re: California Bill to Decriminalize Psychedelics Is Approved by Senate
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
Legalizing weed didn't do that. There's always been an opinion (argument?) that driving high is fine. Carl Sagan even discusses it in Mr. X (1969): > I have mentioned that in the cannabis experience there is a part of your mind that remains a dispassionate observer, who is able to take you down in a hurry if need be. I have on a few occasions been forced to drive in heavy traffic when high. I’ve negotiated it with no…
And Sigmund Freud spent a decade using cocaine daily. Doesn't mean it's OK for everyone else to.
Re: California Bill to Decriminalize Psychedelics Is Approved by Senate
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anyone know why states have bicameral legislatures?
Modeling themselves after the US Congress, itself modeled after the British Parliament (House of Commons and House of Lords). I personally believe bicameral legislatures - allowing houses to deadlock on a bill - are a terrible idea. Either unicameral (used by one US State, Nebraska) or tricameral legislatures, with 2 out of 3 houses needing to approve a bill for it to pass, make much more sense.
Why only one house or three? What exactly would that fix? Sure you eliminate most deadlock, but how does that representation? Also, is deadlock really a bad thing in all scenarios?
Re: California Bill to Decriminalize Psychedelics Is Approved by Senate
#69Doesn't california have a massive drug problem and literal armies of drug addicts shitting in the streets and harassing families and tax-payers? How will this help?
https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/statedeaths/drug-overd...
Re: California Bill to Decriminalize Psychedelics Is Approved by Senate
#70I get LSD and psilocybin, but why ketamine? In either case, I feel like this shouldn't have tried to include ketamine since the perception of it might jeopardize the bill.