Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This is unexpected. They've been down to only one developer (Evan himself) for a while. Still sad :( https://secure.phabricator.com/differential/query/all/
And upstream made it pretty clear that they weren't interested in contributors or building a community :( https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabcontrib/article/cont... > To contribute to the Phabricator upstream, you must first pass a series of ancient trials and be invited to register an account in the ancestral homeland of Phabricator, here on secure.phabricator.com. The nature and location of these trials is a c…
Phacility is winding down, Phabricator no longer actively maintained
61–70 of 147 posts
Re: Phacility is winding down, Phabricator no longer actively maintained
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Try to give it some, get mod bombed. So it goes.
being LAMP stack doesn't make software bad or otherwise more likely to fail commercially. The whole web (excluding some older perl/cgi-bin stuff) was built on it before Rails became popular.
Re: Phacility is winding down, Phabricator no longer actively maintained
#63Re: Phacility is winding down, Phabricator no longer actively maintained
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This is unexpected. They've been down to only one developer (Evan himself) for a while. Still sad :( https://secure.phabricator.com/differential/query/all/
And upstream made it pretty clear that they weren't interested in contributors or building a community :( https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabcontrib/article/cont... > To contribute to the Phabricator upstream, you must first pass a series of ancient trials and be invited to register an account in the ancestral homeland of Phabricator, here on secure.phabricator.com. The nature and location of these trials is a c…
Re: Phacility is winding down, Phabricator no longer actively maintained
#65Evan, if you're reading this and I'm ever in San Francisco soon, I'll have to buy you lunch!
Re: Phacility is winding down, Phabricator no longer actively maintained
#66To clarify: this applies not just to phabricator-dot-com, but Phabricator the software: https://github.com/phacility/phabricator/commit/9ceb66453501... This is unexpected. Many companies, among them as well-resourced as Facebook, use Phabricator. I wonder if it will be forked soon by some party interested in keeping it around. OTOH it looks like none such party exists, because the public sources have not been updated…
FB's phabricator went its own way long ago. I imagine this has exactly zero impact on their day to day. Put it this way: the last time I saw it, they still had the "clowncopterize" button. Try finding that anywhere else.
Re: Phacility is winding down, Phabricator no longer actively maintained
#67Whoa. Really, really disappointed about this. The Phabricator approach to reviews and merges was incredibly impactful on a previous team. It encouraged discipline and an informative main branch that was always linked to reviews, and free of commits like "fixing lint errors" and "actually fix lint errors, for real". https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabflavor/article/recom... The task management system isn't bad ei…
If you’re using GitHub try “Allow squash merging” https://docs.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository...
Re: Phacility is winding down, Phabricator no longer actively maintained
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Try to give it some, get mod bombed. So it goes.
being LAMP stack doesn't make software bad or otherwise more likely to fail commercially. The whole web (excluding some older perl/cgi-bin stuff) was built on it before Rails became popular.
Remember the P was for PHP or Perl.
Re: Phacility is winding down, Phabricator no longer actively maintained
#69This post about shuttering operations is quite devoid of reasons. I can’t imagine customers would be happy about that.
Re: Phacility is winding down, Phabricator no longer actively maintained
#70I've always enjoyed the Phabricator landing page, because it looks like a joke. > Pre-Commit Code Review > Review others' code with Differential, because they can't be trusted. > Shows code so you can look at it. > Leave helpful comments and anecdotes. > Challenge the intern's test plan. > Gently place bad code back in the author's queue.
https://secure.phabricator.com/phame/post/view/777/quick_loo...
> Starting in 2020 Week 20 (Late May), you can suggest an edit when leaving an inline comment in Differential. This feature makes it much easier to get syntax errors and untested code into production quickly.