Live data from Hacker News

The Bitcoin Crash

bbc.co.uk

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: The Bitcoin Crash

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting article. While it is entirely possible to do this, professional traders will soon move in and arbitrage any price differences between exchanges. As competition increases, amateur exchanges that manipulate the price will suffer the consequences, for example, overpaying on the buy side because they've artificially inflated the price. Or traders will just move to another exchange if the spread is too high be…

The delay with getting your money into/out of bitcoin is too long to allow for that kind of arbitrage. The exchange owner could easily get away with the described practices.

You just need an account with some liquidity on every exchange. You could automate an HFT bot that executes a buy order on one exchange and a sell order on the other simultaneously.

Re: The Bitcoin Crash

#62
post #57
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doesn't it make more sense for them to tell both sides and not take a stance? They're journalists--it's not their business to take sides if there is true cause for controversy.

How good of a source is a random forum post, though? Compared to an official line from a company or government, it's pretty shaky.

Although it's a 'random forum post' it's hardly anonymous. The guy's full name (and I think address) turned up in the thread. The idea that something is 'just a random forum post' is usually because the poster is at least pseudo-anonymous if not fully anonymous.
Post reply on HN