Earlier quoted context omitted.
GitHub is a “social coding” platform that provides collaboration features (access control, issues, etc) on top of Git. This is a social coding tool that provides collaboration features on top of Git. It provides a desktop app because it’s peer to peer. That’s an advantage over a web UI for developers looking to avoid a dependency on a centralised third party. You are free to continue to play in walled gardens but thi…
Well the disadvantage is it doesn't even have a Windows client.
Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub
61–70 of 263 posts
Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub
#62Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
GitHub is a “social coding” platform that provides collaboration features (access control, issues, etc) on top of Git. This is a social coding tool that provides collaboration features on top of Git. It provides a desktop app because it’s peer to peer. That’s an advantage over a web UI for developers looking to avoid a dependency on a centralised third party. You are free to continue to play in walled gardens but thi…
Well the disadvantage is it doesn't even have a Windows client.
Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
The main site page is just awful. It's amateurish, image/animation heavy to no value, almost negligable information. They may have something good but the site's just obscuring it.
I think it does a good job listing project ideas / features / roadmap and is a pleasant step away from the bland corporate brands. Love the esthetic. You just can't satisfy everyone.
Edit: perhaps more importantly, I have to gain a feeling for the product, to work out whether it's worth the perhaps nontrivial time evaluating it.
If I'm presented with this what it indicates to me, rightly or not, is that the product is image-led, the project is perhaps childish if the website is (clips from ghost in the shell?), fails to understand technical load (the website's bloated, what does it say about technical competence of the company) and whatever.
I don't care about corporate blandness, I need solid info, directly in front of me, and not having my eyes pulled away by flicker.
I could be completely getting the value of this project wrong but first impressions suggest I may well be wasting my time with it.
Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub
#65I don't understand how using Radicle will free my code as they say in the site. So,how is using Radicle better than: 1. main repo on https://github.com 2. mirror repo on https://repo.or.cz 3. mirror repo on https://codeberg.org 4. local backup on my device and hard-disk. peer-to-peer is beautiful concept but note that git is already distributed VCS. you can have many remotes and mirrors. Just that p2p is not necessar…
So when GitHub is down, how do users know to pull from your mirrors? How about push?
Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub
#66> Software as it should be.
> Free forever
Mostly all popular projects need some form of funding, and setting the expectaction of a free lunch forever for new users is not healthy. Btw, do you remember who used the tagline "It's free and always will be"? It was Facebook.
Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub
#67What a nice funky design. That front page has a soul, unlike almost everything else I see nowadays.
Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub
#68Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub
#69Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub
#70Awesome project, though the perpetuation of open source software needing to be free is regrettable. > Software as it should be. > Free forever Mostly all popular projects need some form of funding, and setting the expectaction of a free lunch forever for new users is not healthy. Btw, do you remember who used the tagline "It's free and always will be"? It was Facebook.