Live data from Hacker News

Hacker News Analysis

blog.echen.me

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: Hacker News Analysis

#61
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You could take the log of any score > 1 to reduce the incentive to game the system.. that way someone who relentlessly karma whores won't have that much more influence than a mildly uprated commenter, but both will have more influence than a noob.

but then a mob of noobs could outrank two wise elders.

Well, with the situation we're in now, only three noobs (or one noob with three accounts) can outrank two wise elders. As to your gp comment, yes, incentivizing karma gains could be a problem, but that's the tradeoff that's got to be considered.

I'm not sure what the best tradeoff is; personally, I'd probably go with something like Pagerank for a while and see if the comment quality (above the fold, at least) improves, but perhaps pg has a desire to keep things more neutral and fair, I'm not sure.

Re: Hacker News Analysis

#62
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've actually implemented a system like this on isdaily (a news site I'm building.) I came to the conclusion that using Karma as a score is a rather bad idea as it assumes that people who get voted up have better judgement: "If you post well you must vote well." But I'm sceptical that this is the case, it's easy to see someone like patio11 has both excellent judgement and a high karma score. But vote power = karma pr…

So in your implementation, you gain voting weight by voting on the posts that have themselves accumulated the highest vote counts? In order for this to work, you'd have to hide vote totals on all posts and comments, which, as jamesbritt pointed out above, eliminates a feedback mechanism that users may find desirable.

I do hide the totals. However you gain vote power for difficult decisions.

So the most vote power is assigned to someone who votes early on a contentious story which later becomes popular.

Post reply on HN