Live data from Hacker News

EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]

statewatch.org

61–70 of 780 posts

Re: EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]

#61
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem is that you can’t leave any room for interpretation, because governments generally interpret things as liberally as they can in their favor, to the brink of absurdity. In other words, “encryption” needs to be listed there as a right, to remove any room for interpretation. Or explicitly listed as an example of a more general right, like the right to private speech (or whatever you want to call it).

The EU ministers do want us to have a right to encryption. They just want to be able to decrypt it.

That is not encrypted then.

Re: EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]

#62
post #51
post #4

We need to establish the use of encryption as a basic human right. I'm so tired of this cropping up every couple years.

I wonder if we can make an encryption protocol that cryptographically securely encrypts an arbitrary English sentence into an English passage that sounds like it makes sense but is unrelated to the ciphertext.

[deleted]

Re: EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> We probably have left at the last minute. If that means you’re British: the GCHQ initiated this. Nobody is more under video surveillance than you guys. Enjoy your chat loicense.

We can now vote for a party who can try to fix this. It wouldn't be possible if that was EU wide.

The EU certainly did not put a gun to your head and ask you to be one of the most surveilled countries in the world.

Re: EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]

#64
post #4

We need to establish the use of encryption as a basic human right. I'm so tired of this cropping up every couple years.

It pretty much is, section 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: > No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks. I mean wearing my programmer goggles it doesn't state privacy AND correspondence but OR, but sti…

They key word is 'arbitrary'.

The courts may not view the police, with a warrant, wanting to see your texts because they believe you're doing something illegal as a form of 'arbitrary' interference.

This new proposal sounds nutty to me, but I think that our various constitutions provide for the possibility of government access to private stuff given legitimacy, proportionality etc.

Re: EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]

#65

So before discussing this I suggest people read the article because the title is misleading This is (from what I understand) not about a blanket ban on encryption, but the possibility to allow wiretapping on certain E2E comms. Also relevant is this recent decision by the ECJ https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/06/ecj-limits-government-spying... (Naturally this is worrying and I think the main issue with security lies on lac…

If you can have wiretapping you don't have E2E encryption. So I think this would be a ban on E2E encryption, not on encryption in general of course but I think that should be self evident.

Re: EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]

#66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> We probably have left at the last minute. If that means you’re British: the GCHQ initiated this. Nobody is more under video surveillance than you guys. Enjoy your chat loicense.

We can now vote for a party who can try to fix this. It wouldn't be possible if that was EU wide.

[deleted]

Re: EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I note that here I am in the UK, and the current home secretary appears to be Priti Patel. Who is far more hardline on this than the EU, and not in the good direction. If we left at the last minute, it's so that we can go faster. One of the things we are deliberately jettisoning is the protections afforded us by being in the EU.

We now have more control and we can vote for a party that could fix this.

There won't be a party who has a chance of being elected that could 'fix' this.

Re: EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]

#68

So to which EU politician do I send GDPR complaint to? The EU politicians have completely isolated themselves from the common folk through their bureaucratical system.

GDPR complaints are sent to your national Data Protection Agency (DPA). Unsure what the relation is to this article though.

Re: EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]

#69

I'm in my early 40s. Up until I was ~35 I was very strongly against this, sort of like most you. Now I feel the EU in general (some member states a lot worse than others) has backed itself into a corner because of the utterly failed integration efforts, union-wide. I live in a EU nation that has seen a very high rise in violent (and sometimes frankly horrible) crime over the past decade. As a dad of a 1-year old daug…

To give up the freedom for the majority to battle a tiny minority of (potentially) bad actors seems like a really bad deal to me.

Re: EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]

#70
post #19

The article makes it sound like a done deal. Is that really the case?

If powers that control EU want it, it will happen. Take a look at ACTA and the regulation that has been pushed.

There are several powers in conflict over "control of the EU". Parliament is often a lot more reasonable than the Commission or the Council of Ministers. They may well reject this. But it's also possible that it will have to go through the Court of Justice, which has to restore our human rights more often that it should need to.
Post reply on HN