Earlier quoted context omitted.
So the unknown wallet was actually the DoJ taking control? I was wondering what they wanted the courts to do. I’m not sure after reading the article. Are they just planning on destroying the wallet key, kind of like if they just burned a billion in seized cash? It’s interesting to think about how to do this. It must be hard to keep an agent from recording the key, and using it 50 years later or something. Theoretical…
> Are they just planning on destroying the wallet key, kind of like if they just burned a billion in seized cash? Why on earth would they do that? Under US law, law enforcement agencies can keep a portion of the proceeds from the sale of any goods they legally seize. This is a massive windfall for them.
U.S. Feds Seized Nearly $1B in Bitcoin from Wallet Linked to Silk Road
61–70 of 369 posts
Re: U.S. Feds Seized Nearly $1B in Bitcoin from Wallet Linked to Silk Road
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same question: Ok we may not be able to brute-force it today for less than $1bn, but tomorrow, may a vulnerability in the algorithm make it possible to regenerate the private key?
If there is ever such a vulnerability in bitcoin that allows you to either - Generate private keys at a rate in which you will be able to produce it in a reasonable time or - Outright reverse engineer the private key from the public key or other metadata Then Bitcoin is broken and that 1bn is worth next to nothing.
They could also short Bitcoin before intentionally crashing it.
Re: U.S. Feds Seized Nearly $1B in Bitcoin from Wallet Linked to Silk Road
#63This gives the US government a lot of power over bitcoin... That both gives the government an incentive to let bitcoin thrive (to protect it's holdings), but also an opportunity to substantially manipulate bitcoins market price, possibly down to nearly zero. Or the keys to these bitcoin will sit idly in a filing cabinet forever...
I feel like if they wanted to, they'd already be playing that game.
It's not out of the realm of possibility this would give an actor more of an opportunity to do so, but it hardly seems required if the motivation was already there. I think it would already be happening if that was the case.
In the meantime the gov has auctioned off their bitcoins like they do other property pretty often.
Re: U.S. Feds Seized Nearly $1B in Bitcoin from Wallet Linked to Silk Road
#64This gives the US government a lot of power over bitcoin... That both gives the government an incentive to let bitcoin thrive (to protect it's holdings), but also an opportunity to substantially manipulate bitcoins market price, possibly down to nearly zero. Or the keys to these bitcoin will sit idly in a filing cabinet forever...
Despite loads of blockchain haters on HN, the government recognizes that bitcoin has value and has formal processes to seize, custody, and auction off the assets to add money to the federal treasury.
Re: U.S. Feds Seized Nearly $1B in Bitcoin from Wallet Linked to Silk Road
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
How would you verify that the private key is unknown? I guess an auditable process in a black box to confirm the key is ever stored. But with $1B at stake, there’s some serious incentive to measure electrical output or something to snoop the key. I guess you could send to a random address, but there’s an infinitesimal chance that someone in the future generates a key with that address, right?
Same question: Ok we may not be able to brute-force it today for less than $1bn, but tomorrow, may a vulnerability in the algorithm make it possible to regenerate the private key?
Re: U.S. Feds Seized Nearly $1B in Bitcoin from Wallet Linked to Silk Road
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
I simultaneously believe blockchain vastly underperfoms its promises and is a net waste of so much investment (human talent + time + capital) and also believe that bitcoin can be exchanged for real US dollars.
You honestly don't see one valuable use-case for bitcoin? And if serious mainstream investors start buying it as an inflation hedge, they are just idiots?
That really doesn't seem like what Bitcoin or the community is all about.
Re: U.S. Feds Seized Nearly $1B in Bitcoin from Wallet Linked to Silk Road
#67Re: U.S. Feds Seized Nearly $1B in Bitcoin from Wallet Linked to Silk Road
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
The regular reply to that strength is usually the rubber hose threat. Which is pretty much what happened here it seems with the person who had control of the private key in custody of the government.
This is the XKCD you're looking for: https://xkcd.com/538/
Re: U.S. Feds Seized Nearly $1B in Bitcoin from Wallet Linked to Silk Road
#69If history is any guide, the bitcoin will be auctioned off sooner rather than later.
Re: U.S. Feds Seized Nearly $1B in Bitcoin from Wallet Linked to Silk Road
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
You honestly don't see one valuable use-case for bitcoin? And if serious mainstream investors start buying it as an inflation hedge, they are just idiots?
Is that a valuable use case? Just another instrument to try to use as a hedge? That really doesn't seem like what Bitcoin or the community is all about.