Earlier quoted context omitted.
This isn't how the launch orders are issued. Submarines do not have a voice channel to the president, or to the military command. They receive coded signals that instruct them to take particular actions. Creating the appropriate coded signal is a fundamental part of the launch control chain. Also if the president is killed, and the vice president and the head of the senate... eventually the question is "who has the c…
The codes used to signal submarines are demonstrably not the “nuclear launch codes”. The military hierarchy is established and chain of command is already established for contingencies like “who gives orders when the top brass are assassinated.”
Keep the nuclear launch codes in an innocent volunteer's chest-cavity (2015)
61–62 of 62 posts
Re: Keep the nuclear launch codes in an innocent volunteer's chest-cavity (2015)
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
> So the President would never have to bloody his or her hands You missed the point. The whole argument is that if POTUS had to kill someone, they wouldn’t make the decision to kill many others. “The winning move is not to play,” as Joshua said in War Games (1983). They wouldn’t actually put the president in the situation, it’s just a sanity check thought experiment. Nukes are expensive posturing- the big stick to ho…
I understand that. But if the POTUS could order someone to do the dirty job for them, then they wouldn't actually have to think about it, so they'd remain removed from the reality of killing someone (or a few million people). So the POTUS doesn't have to play or not play- they are immune to this kind of morality experiment. It's like trying to second-guess god (a non-existent entity). What have we learned from the ex…