>The AA twelve-step program isn't Gospel, and it wasn't handed down on tablets at Sinai.
>But it does encapsulate a lot of wisdom, and the first step is to admit powerlessness over the addiction.
That's right, except about being powerless. I'm not downing AA, as it has helped many people over the years.
In fact, My brother is a friend of Bill and has been clean for 36 years. And up until the lockdowns, he still went to meetings.
However, the twelve steps aren't a panacea. In fact, some estimate[0] that only 5-8% of those who engage with AA actually end up clean and sticking with it.
I disagree with the idea that you need to "admit powerlessness." And the rest of the pseudo-religious mumbo-jumbo is just that.
Addiction is not a failure of willpower. To beat it, willpower is required, but it's often (usually) not enough.
>Look, it's obvious this isn't a subject you know anything about, and congratulations on that. But maybe stop making confident pronouncements which don't work.
It may not have been for GP, but it is for me -- not just WRT my brother -- but in my own life and issues with substance abuse.
There is no one right answer for everyone. And AA's methods, while not harmful (and often beneficial, even if the message is couched in hokey religious terms) can and does help many people. But it's not the only, nor is it the best, way to help people address addiction -- whether that be alcohol, drugs, technology or anything else.
[0] https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/04/the-irr...
Edit: Corrected estimate of success rate for AA.