Earlier quoted context omitted.
If that were to happen I can imagine at least some people who were for his pardon in ‘14 would denounce the pardon if it came to be.
Trump should pardon Snowden because it's the right thing to do. He should also not be undercutting the post office, assassinating Iranian generals, enforcing tariffs on allies like Canada and Europe. Pardoning Snowden is a meaningless gesture, it does nothing to stop the military industrial complex and the intelligence apparatus that he supports
Trump: 'A lot of people' think Edward Snowden 'not being treated fairly'
61–70 of 85 posts
Re: Trump: 'A lot of people' think Edward Snowden 'not being treated fairly'
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Trump should pardon Snowden because it's the right thing to do. He should also not be undercutting the post office, assassinating Iranian generals, enforcing tariffs on allies like Canada and Europe. Pardoning Snowden is a meaningless gesture, it does nothing to stop the military industrial complex and the intelligence apparatus that he supports
The only one I disagree with is cutting funding to USPS. Europe and Canada (nor anyone not specially exempted) should not enjoy advantage in trade. People were beside themselves over rumors of Russian snipers, this guy was directly responsible for troop deaths and much more instability in the ME. We’ve just seen peace agreements begin to bear fruit in the ME —would that have been possible with that guy stirring up ho…
Should Trump then assassinate Bush and Obama?
Re: Trump: 'A lot of people' think Edward Snowden 'not being treated fairly'
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Trump should pardon Snowden because it's the right thing to do. He should also not be undercutting the post office, assassinating Iranian generals, enforcing tariffs on allies like Canada and Europe. Pardoning Snowden is a meaningless gesture, it does nothing to stop the military industrial complex and the intelligence apparatus that he supports
If a European country lets a hostile country like Russia earn trillions by running pipelines through their country, are they really that much of an ally? Tarrifs make perfect sense in response to actions like that
The facts are just too obvious. Trump is pro-Russia, he's done nothing but allow it to expand and influence US elections, too.
Re: Trump: 'A lot of people' think Edward Snowden 'not being treated fairly'
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Manning stood to face her her crimes like a long line of revered civil disobedients before her. Snowden ran away into the arms of a hostile foreign power. That has just as much to do with pissing off the government as what either of them revealed.
The laws that would out Snowden and Manning in prison for life are unjust and there's nothing wrong with what either of them did. I don't blame Snowden for leaving a country full of idiots calling for his death
Re: Trump: 'A lot of people' think Edward Snowden 'not being treated fairly'
#65Re: Trump: 'A lot of people' think Edward Snowden 'not being treated fairly'
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
The only one I disagree with is cutting funding to USPS. Europe and Canada (nor anyone not specially exempted) should not enjoy advantage in trade. People were beside themselves over rumors of Russian snipers, this guy was directly responsible for troop deaths and much more instability in the ME. We’ve just seen peace agreements begin to bear fruit in the ME —would that have been possible with that guy stirring up ho…
> this guy was directly responsible for troop deaths and much more instability in the ME. Should Trump then assassinate Bush and Obama?
Re: Trump: 'A lot of people' think Edward Snowden 'not being treated fairly'
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
In no particular order. 1) Trump is very much not of fan of the sorts of shadowy warrant-less surveillance that snowed exposed (because he feels it was used against him) so this could be a dig at that apparatus. 2) Obama didn't pardon him despite doing so being far more popular on the left than right (at least up until present, no telling what will happen going forward) and this could force Biden in a tricky situatio…
> because he feels it was used against him It's seeming like this is quickly turning from a "he feels it was used against him" into an unequivocal "it was used against him".
Re: Trump: 'A lot of people' think Edward Snowden 'not being treated fairly'
#68That sounds suspiciously like he's considering pardoning Snowden. Also... going from calling for Snowden's execution to potentially pardoning him is one hell of a 180.
I voted for Obama twice, and the fact that he didn't pardon him told me everything I need to know about him being full of shit and made me regret ever supporting him.
FYI: I worked at Booz Allen when Snowden went public. I can't talk about any details, but basically I upended my life, left DC, and went pure private sector as a direct result of his revelations. I still don't make what I made then, and I don't care. If not for him, I would have still been working on stuff that was undermining the US constitution. All my coworkers were acting like he was Satan, and how he made Booz Allen look bad, and blah blah blah. My favorite moment was asking my coworker, who was defending the spying, if she would give me her email password. You can guess the response.
Re: Trump: 'A lot of people' think Edward Snowden 'not being treated fairly'
#69Re: Trump: 'A lot of people' think Edward Snowden 'not being treated fairly'
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
If a European country lets a hostile country like Russia earn trillions by running pipelines through their country, are they really that much of an ally? Tarrifs make perfect sense in response to actions like that
Trump has continually let Russia do as it pleases, he kowtowed in Syria to Putin, he kowtowed by threatening to constantly defund NATO, he kowtowed in Crimea. The facts are just too obvious. Trump is pro-Russia, he's done nothing but allow it to expand and influence US elections, too.
I understand we benefit from that too, but why should we carry the burden more than the direct beneficiaries?