Live data from Hacker News

Color

color.com

61–70 of 76 posts

Re: Color

#61
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Especially in cities, where sharing photos with the people within 100 feet of you can include anyone in your 20 story apartment building. Even if the rate of obscene photos is low, just one could ruin the user experience.

What does constitute to you as obscene and why would it ruin your user experience?

Dicks, mostly.

Re: Color

#62

I'm interested in the exploits that may target this. First thing I would want to do is create a way to spoof my location in real-time and see what's going on in that place right then. Then I would want to send everyone in that area a picture of goatse.

It seems there are already apps for that https://market.android.com/details?id=com.forgottenprojects....

Re: Color

#64
post #20
post #4

Related article: http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/23/color-looks-to-reinvent-soc... According to one of the comments at TC, the domain cost $350K. It's cool to see newer (and well-funded) startups going for non-"web 2.0" names, e.g. Path, and now Color.

It's a warning sign when startups have the cash to invest in a domain name before they have traction. Talk about putting the cart before the horse.

A domain is an asset, why would it be worth notably less after a few years if the startup were to fail?

Re: Color

#65

I'm interested in the exploits that may target this. First thing I would want to do is create a way to spoof my location in real-time and see what's going on in that place right then. Then I would want to send everyone in that area a picture of goatse.

Brilliant. Definitely on this.

If you see some photos of amused british people in their living room representing themselves as having been taken deep in the most self-regarding of san francisco's fashionable hangouts, that was us.

Re: Color

#67
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Especially in cities, where sharing photos with the people within 100 feet of you can include anyone in your 20 story apartment building. Even if the rate of obscene photos is low, just one could ruin the user experience.

What does constitute to you as obscene and why would it ruin your user experience?

Penises, because I don't want to see anyone else's.

Re: Color

#68
post #43

I just tried the app and definitely didn't like it, it mandatory requires you to give away your location information otherwise you cannot use the app. That's not the way to go guys :S specially with the recent discussions about internet privacy...

using the app without providing your location would make you a voyeur, which is not cool. the fact that they force you to disclose your location to use it is the first thing i've heard about this app that i like.

For some reason that makes me feel uncomfortable, heres the thing: you can share picture with the friends you have around, let's say the people that's in the same room to get "different angles of the same event", if they're already with you, what's the point of disclosing my location with the app?

Re: Color

#69
post #64
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a warning sign when startups have the cash to invest in a domain name before they have traction. Talk about putting the cart before the horse.

A domain is an asset, why would it be worth notably less after a few years if the startup were to fail?

Exactly: provided that $350,000 was a decent price (which doesn't seem too unreasonable) and the fair value does not decline they now have a $350,000 intangible asset on their balance sheet that will not likely decline in value.

You can't say the same for a similar amount of put into high end office furniture, for example.

Post reply on HN