This has been a fairly obvious service that has been missing for a while, nice to see them provide a solution. Most dependency management tools have some kind of hacky support for using S3 directly. Full fledged artifact management tools like Artifactory and Nexus support S3 backed storage. Interesting to see that the pricing is approximately double that of S3, for what I imagine is not much more than a thin layer on…
AWS CodeArtifact: A fully managed software artifact repository service
61–70 of 92 posts
Re: AWS CodeArtifact: A fully managed software artifact repository service
#62This has been a fairly obvious service that has been missing for a while, nice to see them provide a solution. Most dependency management tools have some kind of hacky support for using S3 directly. Full fledged artifact management tools like Artifactory and Nexus support S3 backed storage. Interesting to see that the pricing is approximately double that of S3, for what I imagine is not much more than a thin layer on…
Considering the price of Nexus and Artifactory this is way cheaper for a SAAS offering with SLA's. I imagine Artifactory is really going to have to up their product offering or at least lower their entry prices.
Re: AWS CodeArtifact: A fully managed software artifact repository service
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
I could not disagree more re. the expiring credentials. It is a bad practice to have credentials that never expire, especially on developer laptops, especially credentials of this nature. Developers frequently store this stuff in plain text in their home directory or as environment variables. That's a huge security risk! This service manages the process of generating and expiring credentials automatically, which is a…
> I could not disagree more re. the expiring credentials. It is a bad practice to have credentials that never expire, especially on developer laptops, especially credentials of this nature. For the specific use case of the developer box and the Docker registry, resetting the credentials every 12 hours doesn't offer any more security than not on its own. The reason for that is after you try to login to ECR after the e…
There is absolutely no reason with the tools that we have available that we should be creating long living AWS keys. It's a major security risk if those keys ever got out.
Re: AWS CodeArtifact: A fully managed software artifact repository service
#64Re: AWS CodeArtifact: A fully managed software artifact repository service
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Considering the price of Nexus and Artifactory this is way cheaper for a SAAS offering with SLA's. I imagine Artifactory is really going to have to up their product offering or at least lower their entry prices.
Meta: I’ve vouched for your killed comment. I suspect you may be shadowbanned.
Re: AWS CodeArtifact: A fully managed software artifact repository service
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
Meta: I’ve vouched for your killed comment. I suspect you may be shadowbanned.
Thanks for letting me know, I will reach out to the HN email and ask them why. I suspect it is because of some comments where I got -Karma.
Re: AWS CodeArtifact: A fully managed software artifact repository service
#67This has been a fairly obvious service that has been missing for a while, nice to see them provide a solution. Most dependency management tools have some kind of hacky support for using S3 directly. Full fledged artifact management tools like Artifactory and Nexus support S3 backed storage. Interesting to see that the pricing is approximately double that of S3, for what I imagine is not much more than a thin layer on…
We have used S3 successfully several times. You can create a Maven repository, use it as RPM repo and many other use cases to host artifacts. I am not sure what functionality is missing that cannot be implemented on the top of S3 and requires CodeArtifact.
All I'm seeing this does is give the proper http endpoints so you dont need the wagon. Is it worth ~2x the price, no, but it's better than the other enterprise-y solutions.
Re: AWS CodeArtifact: A fully managed software artifact repository service
#68Re: AWS CodeArtifact: A fully managed software artifact repository service
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
We have used S3 successfully several times. You can create a Maven repository, use it as RPM repo and many other use cases to host artifacts. I am not sure what functionality is missing that cannot be implemented on the top of S3 and requires CodeArtifact.
For maven, to push artifacts via the correct mvn deploy:deploy-file requires a S3 wagon (transport layer) software to actually make the S3 calls. For bigger orgs, having everyone use a wagon is a non-starter. All I'm seeing this does is give the proper http endpoints so you dont need the wagon. Is it worth ~2x the price, no, but it's better than the other enterprise-y solutions.
Re: AWS CodeArtifact: A fully managed software artifact repository service
#70This has been a fairly obvious service that has been missing for a while, nice to see them provide a solution. Most dependency management tools have some kind of hacky support for using S3 directly. Full fledged artifact management tools like Artifactory and Nexus support S3 backed storage. Interesting to see that the pricing is approximately double that of S3, for what I imagine is not much more than a thin layer on…
Considering the price of Nexus and Artifactory this is way cheaper for a SAAS offering with SLA's. I imagine Artifactory is really going to have to up their product offering or at least lower their entry prices.