Live data from Hacker News

Real reasons why tech giants are hugging “Remote Work”

om.co

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: Real reasons why tech giants are hugging “Remote Work”

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Isn’t this called “salary”? I don’t expect my employer to cook and feed me lunch You might not, but many tech companies in SF do exactly that, and it is a legitimate part of your compensation.

The cost of my lunch is a trivial fraction of my family's grocery bill though. Are remote workers going to ask for a clothing stipend in lieu of company-branded T-shirts as well?

It's definitely thousands of dollars to go eat lunch in SF, a year. Plus companies often serve breakfast/dinner. And, in the case of my last company (Dropbox), the food was absurdly good. I considered my Dropbox food to be like 50k in value to me.

Re: Real reasons why tech giants are hugging “Remote Work”

#62
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The main potential savings is not from avoiding office leases, it's from hiring engineers for 1/3 of the cost or less from places like Europe, India, and Brazil.

What stops them from doing that already? Facebook has offices in Brazil: https://www.facebook.com/careers/locations/saopaulo/?p[offic... Why didn’t they close down the Palo Alto office already?

Yes, remote work has always been a thing. The claim is that COVID will accelerate the trend toward a global and remote workforce.

Companies have been forced into large-scale WFH experiments. If the experiments show that productivity is totally fine without open office plans and in-person collaboration over lunch break, then they will inevitably ask why they shouldn't save a ton of money by hiring a greater proportion of engineers outside of the Bay Area.

Post reply on HN