I am sad about how far apart we're growing as people due to virus that is no more scary than the flu.
Safe: Set maximum capacity for any room, floor, or building
61–70 of 85 posts
Re: Safe: Set maximum capacity for any room, floor, or building
#62I am sad about how far apart we're growing as people due to virus that is no more scary than the flu.
Funny you say no more scary than the flu when the flu is literally the cause of the last pandemic that killed 3% if the global population.
Re: Safe: Set maximum capacity for any room, floor, or building
#63So ... how does it work, given that 2m is not enough, and the distance of 10m is thought to be more likely? :)
My first thought is this puts way too much stock in the idea that rooms are safe as long as they aren't too packed. To me it seems like this 1.5m rule and person limits aren't actually backed up by real research and are just numbers pulled out of a hat when something had to be done fast. We shouldn't be finding ways to get people back in to shared buildings as soon as possible because infections don't just give up be…
A virus like corona with a high R0 would spread like crazy in a building with active ventilation piping. Or an airliner.
Corona is really a non-event in SF.
Re: Safe: Set maximum capacity for any room, floor, or building
#64I am sad about how far apart we're growing as people due to virus that is no more scary than the flu.
Re: Safe: Set maximum capacity for any room, floor, or building
#65Re: Safe: Set maximum capacity for any room, floor, or building
#66Re: Safe: Set maximum capacity for any room, floor, or building
#67I think it could work. Heavens know, I will now have to actively avoid places that are not at least careful about how they reopen. I am mildly concerned about people, who see doing the opposite as a political expression, but some things cannot be helped.
> I am mildly concerned about people, who see doing the opposite as a political expression Those people are a very small but vocal minority, being amplified by social media. All the data says that most people are complying with safe practices, even when their governments aren't requiring it.
I disagree. Tens of thousands of people in my state don’t obey any stay at home order. People take off masks once in stores.
As someone who also goes out a lot right now I haven’t seen anyone be asked to put their mask on or leave.
Re: Safe: Set maximum capacity for any room, floor, or building
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I am mildly concerned about people, who see doing the opposite as a political expression Those people are a very small but vocal minority, being amplified by social media. All the data says that most people are complying with safe practices, even when their governments aren't requiring it.
> Those people are a very small but vocal minority, being amplified by social media. I disagree. Tens of thousands of people in my state don’t obey any stay at home order. People take off masks once in stores. As someone who also goes out a lot right now I haven’t seen anyone be asked to put their mask on or leave.
Re: Safe: Set maximum capacity for any room, floor, or building
#69The idea is definitely cool (and important/impactful at this time if successful). That said, in the midst of a global pandemic where human density is inherently dangerous and social distancing is espoused, naming a product "Safe by Density" gives the exact opposite initial reaction you're probably hoping for.
Re: Safe: Set maximum capacity for any room, floor, or building
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Those people are a very small but vocal minority, being amplified by social media. I disagree. Tens of thousands of people in my state don’t obey any stay at home order. People take off masks once in stores. As someone who also goes out a lot right now I haven’t seen anyone be asked to put their mask on or leave.
Which state? And how do you know tens of thousands are ignoring it?