Earlier quoted context omitted.
> a few companies owning the data The data are public [1]. Dark Sky et al process and repackage those data, along with their own analytics and UI. [1] https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/webservices/v2
Et al - maybe, but Dark Sky built their own near-future "hyperlocal" forecasting engine and they were the first ones to do that. They basically invented the whole genre. Perhaps they expanded into repackaging NOAA data now, but that's not what Dark Sky is about.
Apple acquires Dark Sky
61–70 of 594 posts
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
> a few companies owning the data The data are public [1]. Dark Sky et al process and repackage those data, along with their own analytics and UI. [1] https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/webservices/v2
As someone that's tried using the weather.gov API, let me just say it's atrociously bad. I'm sure the data is accurate and all, but the API is actively hostile towards developers.
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#63... And here's the graph for up-to-the-minute detail: https://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?lat=37.3367&lon=-1...
It ain't pretty, but it works and you've already paid for it.
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#64Let's not forget that, at least in the US, weather data is publicly funded and excellent forecasts are available at a very granular level. For example, here's the weather at Apple Park: https://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?lon=-122.009263237... ... And here's the graph for up-to-the-minute detail: https://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?lat=37.3367&lon=-1... It ain't pretty, but it works and you've already pai…
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
> a few companies owning the data The data are public [1]. Dark Sky et al process and repackage those data, along with their own analytics and UI. [1] https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/webservices/v2
As someone that's tried using the weather.gov API, let me just say it's atrociously bad. I'm sure the data is accurate and all, but the API is actively hostile towards developers.
See https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/14/politics/noaa-nominee-accuwea...
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#66Sounds like they gave up on their goal or changed the definition of "the world" to 13% [1] of smartphone users.
I always loved Dark Sky as an Android user, guess I'll find something else.
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#67Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#68> "Android and Wear OS App" > "The app will no longer be available for download. Service to existing users and subscribers will continue until July 1, 2020, at which point the app will be shut down. Subscribers who are still active at that time will receive a refund." That's unfortunate. I have been using it for years. Any recommended alternatives?
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
> a few companies owning the data The data are public [1]. Dark Sky et al process and repackage those data, along with their own analytics and UI. [1] https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/webservices/v2
As someone that's tried using the weather.gov API, let me just say it's atrociously bad. I'm sure the data is accurate and all, but the API is actively hostile towards developers.