Earlier quoted context omitted.
Given commercial pressures would a Boeing reentry vehicle be over designed to such a extent that on such a failure (failure to separate, entering with the wrong attitude ?correct term?) result in "...the craft righted itself before the escape hatch was burned through"?
I would assume it would work the same as with the soyuz, provided that the service module separates/explodes before the capsule reentering the wrong way is irrecoverably damaged. Basically, all space capsules have their of gravity placed in such a way that they will automatically orient themselves heat shield forward once they encounter the atmosphere. So once the service module is gone, it should flip into the corre…
Starliner faced “catastrophic” failure before software bug found
61–64 of 64 posts
Re: Starliner faced “catastrophic” failure before software bug found
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Makes me wonder why put all this effort to make space-travel safe for crews. Why not focus on remotely controlled or AI autonomous vehicles instead?
> Makes me wonder why put all this effort to make space-travel safe for crews Would you want to board that capsule yourself, otherwise? > Why not focus on remotely controlled or AI autonomous vehicles instead? Buzzwords doesn't make something more reliable/less error prone. You really think that by throwing in something like AI, which can fail in unexpected ways, be a good idea?
Re: Starliner faced “catastrophic” failure before software bug found
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Makes me wonder why put all this effort to make space-travel safe for crews. Why not focus on remotely controlled or AI autonomous vehicles instead?
I think we already do — there have been roughly 15 satellites etc. launched for every human who has ever reached earth orbit over the entire history of human spaceflight.
Re: Starliner faced “catastrophic” failure before software bug found
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Makes me wonder why put all this effort to make space-travel safe for crews. Why not focus on remotely controlled or AI autonomous vehicles instead?
It’s hard enough to get an AI to work well in a known situation line driving, never mind an unknown planet. But more importantly - where is the fun in that?