Earlier quoted context omitted.
As timescaledb is now banned with all third party extensions, I don't have a server where I can reproduce that. But it was 100% reproducible on a very simple routine scenario (add many records to an existing timescale db) Just try to do a massive '\copy from' into a table that is already a timescaledb, using a tsv source with at least a few million records, make sure the dates are well spread out. Then use windowing…
Cool, we'll take a look. First we've heard of it so really curious what might be going on. Thanks!
Open-source and the demise of proprietary software (2018)
61–63 of 63 posts
Re: Open-source and the demise of proprietary software (2018)
#62But to a programmer, I guess it may look like open source is replacing everything else. That's because we programmers have gradually have replaced everything we use with open source - compilers, editors, web servers, libraries for just about everything. Even stuff we use play with rather than get paid for is replaced - like photo and video editors, 3D printers, model plane piloting software.
It's easy for us, and cheaper in the long run, and given enough time the end result is better quality than the proprietary stuff because we all pitch in to knock off the paper cuts.
But it really is a case of "scratching itches", so if a programmer doesn't get itchy about something then it usually won't have an open source version. It's not hard to find examples. There are some usable PCB design tools out there - but 3D mechanic drafting tools weren't a thing until 3D printers tickled our interest in that area. Anything that requires specialised hardware is going to be out of reach - so you won't see open source MRI scanners, but I have no doubt you will see devices using 2 cheap web cams to do SLAM in the not too distant future.
This has had the accidental effect of making us more efficient. Any tool we can conceive of that allows us to do our job done better is free. The tools we already constantly get better - for free. In any other industry this might be a problem as supply overwhelms demand, but we seem to be in the odd position of the world demanding what appears to be a near infinite amount of software.
I am constantly amazed by how the demand for good programmers never seems to tail off. Even where I live (Australia) which has very high wages by international standards, and in the face of huge numbers of programmers coming out of low wage areas, _and_ in the face of jobs being some of the most transportable on earth, anyone competent programmer who wants a job gets one within weeks. I think we partially have open source to thank for that.
But step outside of what programmers want, and we are as mercenary as the rest of them. We are more than happy to develop nice new shinies we use and give them away for free, but we know who butters our bread. We don't write code for them for free. And since we are all getting paid, that must mean most of the code we write isn't available for free.
Re: Open-source and the demise of proprietary software (2018)
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Open source is enabling large corporations to establish monopolies. Open source powers google and amazon yet the authors get little return from it. Open source has killed indie development.
> Open source is enabling large corporations to establish monopolies. > Open source powers google and amazon yet the authors get little return from it. A different license could fix that but that goes against the philosophy; it would fix it though. People are trying that and a lot of other people are dead against it for good reasons, but how else can it be fixed? Even if you don't make it viral towards revenue, then…
This is a big assumption. How many open source developers do so for altruistic reasons? How many open source developers are funded by companies looking for good will.
There’s a simplistic view that developers only want money and that if they don’t get rich, that’s bad. That may be true for some, but those people would need to be stupid to desire wealth from software and still make lots of contributions to open source projects.
There are many benefits other than just payment.
I’ll also add that open source is really diverse and there are many companies profitable and happy chugging along or getting bought out (red hat, canonical, jetbrains, etc etc).
If people want to get wealthy fro software there are many companies doing so. Either through selling licenses (Microsoft) or just making secret sauce that doesn’t get sold (google, Amazon, Wall Street).
I would agree with you if there was no path to riches or there was some weird open source draft that forces people to code without pay.
But as it is now, developers can choose, and do, to donate their time and brainpower writing free/libre software.