Earlier quoted context omitted.
That comment would be a lot more valuable if you corrected the record. To just gainsay what is written here accompanied by a strong reference to your authority is not how it is done imo, and if you can't or don't want to talk about it then you also shouldn't comment like this.
Fair enough. It would take a really long time to make a point by point rebuttal, but here are a few: Phase detection is not the same thing at plenoptic; the article implies that phase detection operates in the same way as a microlens array. It doesn't; microlens arrays for plenoptic imaging have many pixels underneath, and perform different operations on them. This line: "With only two pixels in one, there's still en…
Thank you for adding this, I only saw it much later.