Live data from Hacker News

McKinsey: Half the World’s Banks Too Weak to Survive Downturn

bloomberg.com

61–70 of 165 posts

Re: McKinsey: Half the World’s Banks Too Weak to Survive Downturn

#61
post #44

And if you're a bank, guess who is conveniently standing by ready to fix it for you with an army of $2000 an hour consultants? McKinsey. Same exact scam as the shady mechanic who wants charge you $400 to flush your transmission fluid and convinces you that your car will surely blow up if you don't do it.

2k/hr?????

It's basically therapy for corporate executives, delivered via powerpoint, with a healthy side of blame insurance. And yeah, it's expensive.

Re: McKinsey: Half the World’s Banks Too Weak to Survive Downturn

#62
post #44

And if you're a bank, guess who is conveniently standing by ready to fix it for you with an army of $2000 an hour consultants? McKinsey. Same exact scam as the shady mechanic who wants charge you $400 to flush your transmission fluid and convinces you that your car will surely blow up if you don't do it.

Exactly.

> All while building the talent and the advanced data-analytics infrastructure required to compete

Guess who, among the top consulting groups is currently investing a lot in data-analysis at the moment? Yes, McKinsey.

Re: McKinsey: Half the World’s Banks Too Weak to Survive Downturn

#63
post #44

And if you're a bank, guess who is conveniently standing by ready to fix it for you with an army of $2000 an hour consultants? McKinsey. Same exact scam as the shady mechanic who wants charge you $400 to flush your transmission fluid and convinces you that your car will surely blow up if you don't do it.

Exactly. > All while building the talent and the advanced data-analytics infrastructure required to compete Guess who, among the top consulting groups is currently investing a lot in data-analysis at the moment? Yes, McKinsey.

They are pretty late to the party, Gamma [0] is more mature and more experienced than their McKinsey counterpart.

[0] https://www.bcg.com/beyond-consulting/bcg-gamma/default.aspx

Re: McKinsey: Half the World’s Banks Too Weak to Survive Downturn

#64
post #44

And if you're a bank, guess who is conveniently standing by ready to fix it for you with an army of $2000 an hour consultants? McKinsey. Same exact scam as the shady mechanic who wants charge you $400 to flush your transmission fluid and convinces you that your car will surely blow up if you don't do it.

2k/hr?????

Sounds high. Top partners at law firms will have rates lower than that.

Re: McKinsey: Half the World’s Banks Too Weak to Survive Downturn

#65
post #44

And if you're a bank, guess who is conveniently standing by ready to fix it for you with an army of $2000 an hour consultants? McKinsey. Same exact scam as the shady mechanic who wants charge you $400 to flush your transmission fluid and convinces you that your car will surely blow up if you don't do it.

2k/hr?????

actual mckinsey employee. no, other posters don't know what they're talking about. Fees will vary, but that's way, way too high except for perhaps the senior partners (who wouldn't be there most of the time anyway). ffs

Re: McKinsey: Half the World’s Banks Too Weak to Survive Downturn

#66
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not to get too bogged down with details, but this winter she is looking to change EMR systems. The current one is the most expensive/established EMR for her field. Rent is 12,000 dollars of expenses. EMR is almost trivial.

Vast majority of private practices are closing or being purchased by larger hospital systems.

Sure, same is true for software startups. Trade long hours and slightly above market pay for a lump sum payment and predictable patient load? The increasing complexity of interacting with health insurance providers and diagnostic labs has something to do with it, also. Why wouldn't a lot of them do that?

Re: McKinsey: Half the World’s Banks Too Weak to Survive Downturn

#67
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly. > All while building the talent and the advanced data-analytics infrastructure required to compete Guess who, among the top consulting groups is currently investing a lot in data-analysis at the moment? Yes, McKinsey.

They are pretty late to the party, Gamma [0] is more mature and more experienced than their McKinsey counterpart. [0] https://www.bcg.com/beyond-consulting/bcg-gamma/default.aspx

Not really. They're pretty much the same.

*current mckinsey data scientist who got an offer from both Gamma and McKinsey, and turned down Gamma despite being offered a higher salary.

Re: McKinsey: Half the World’s Banks Too Weak to Survive Downturn

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>For the rest of us debtors...it remains an ongoing disaster Taxpayers didn't pay for bailouts. The Fed did. Taxpayers did make a profit form them, however, since the profits the Fed saw from the bailouts were, by law, handed over to Treasury (except for statutory operating expenses), offsetting taxes. >those who greased the runways for the shareholders with their lost homes Most of those those losing homes did so by…

> Taxpayers didn't pay for bailouts. The Fed did. The 2+ Trillion dollar expansion of the Fed balance sheet during the crisis costs taxpayers every day that they pay interest on a loan enabled by that 2T+ expansion. Every house that used to be $200K and is now $500K is part of the price people are paying for how the crisis was managed. > But don't just blame bankers. Also blame borrowers defaulting. The core function…

>The 2+ Trillion dollar expansion of the Fed balance sheet during the crisis costs taxpayers every day that they pay interest on a loan enabled by that 2T+ expansion.

Taxpayers don't pay interest on Fed assets. You have a fundamental misunderstanding of how monetary policy works. What makes you think your statement true? Did you read it in a explanation of how the Fed works, or did you make it up?

>The financialization and securitization of housing was the creation of bankers, not borrowers.

This is shortsighted and incorrect. If borrowers didn't default, there would be no crisis. Many were expecting housing to rise forever and were taking out second mortgages as piggy banks, then got in trouble when prices didn't increase forever. High risk borrowers could keep refinancing at higher and higher prices since house prices were climbing. When the prices stopped climbing, this process stopped.

>Debtors have been defaulting for millennia, it's a well-understood process.

And bubbles from irrational people have been happening for millennia too. Does this simplistic tautology allow me to assign all blame to borrowers?

Re: McKinsey: Half the World’s Banks Too Weak to Survive Downturn

#69
post #50
post #44

And if you're a bank, guess who is conveniently standing by ready to fix it for you with an army of $2000 an hour consultants? McKinsey. Same exact scam as the shady mechanic who wants charge you $400 to flush your transmission fluid and convinces you that your car will surely blow up if you don't do it.

The difference is that in most cases, the shady mechanic is not somebody you already know from college, or from golf or your national frat society. McKinsey gets paid ungodly sums in part because they are the archetype of the old boy's club. Their new hires usually come only from top business schools, and likely already have several years under their belt at the types of companies McKinsey gets business from. In addi…

It's still an old boys club, but it's more revolving door now. You flip between industry and consulting. Each move you bring a few with you who reward you later.

Re: McKinsey: Half the World’s Banks Too Weak to Survive Downturn

#70
post #44

And if you're a bank, guess who is conveniently standing by ready to fix it for you with an army of $2000 an hour consultants? McKinsey. Same exact scam as the shady mechanic who wants charge you $400 to flush your transmission fluid and convinces you that your car will surely blow up if you don't do it.

2k/hr?????

plus expenses!
Post reply on HN