Live data from Hacker News

Greta Thunberg: 'How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood'

youtube.com

61–70 of 98 posts

Re: Greta Thunberg: 'How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood'

#61
post #54
post #12

I think the people who have coerced her into being a propaganda piece are the ones who have stolen her childhood. It's not like the earth is on fire right now. In fact, living conditions are better than they ever have been. There's more food security worldwide than at any point in human history. Less war than ever. Less poverty than ever before. Yes, climate change will cause issues. Then again, the last glacial maxi…

> It's not like the earth is on fire right now. Sure. Fires in the arctic are normal things [1]. 100+ degree summers in Germany and France are totes the norm. [2]. Reality has a climate-crisis bias. > In fact, living conditions are better than they ever have been. This is a false dichotomy - that improved worldwide living conditions don't indicate a looming climate crisis. It could be argued that it all gets better u…

> Fires in the arctic are normal things

Forest fires in places with forests, who'd have thought?

Re: Greta Thunberg: 'How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood'

#62
post #59
post #15

Just a quick question: why Greta is not talking about world overpopulation? I think it's a huge problem. The more we are on this planet, the more mess we make. And by the way, it's too easy to shame western countries to be the root of all evil in this world.

Because there is no world overpopulation. People talk about overpopulation since ancient times. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_overpopulation#History_o... Currently standard of living are growing almost all over the world and human population is predicted to pick and stabilize at around 11 billion. I really recommend "DON'T PANIC — Hans Rosling showing the facts about population" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=…

If the global population was still 2 billion as in the early 1900s, I'm certain we wouldn't have a climate crisis anywhere near the scale we're seeing today. We should be panicking, and I don't understand why our population should be allowed to grow until the Earth literally cannot sustain it. We're an intelligent and evolved species, and we'd all be better off exercising some self-control and keeping our population in check.

And yes, I would gladly give up my right to procreate. I have no interest in having children, primarily because I believe it's a terrible thing to do in today's world.

Re: Greta Thunberg: 'How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood'

#63

Was her message to (failing to) act imply actual technical steps and commitment to reduce certain variables in certain years or increase taxes? I am confused here. sarcasm And yes, of course, global warming is the biggest existential threat to humanity. Poverty, hunger, addiction, homelessness, open defecation, and other trivial issues aren't really the ones Governments' should prioritize, it should be protecting hum…

This is a straw man. No one thinks climate change is the only thing a government should spend money on. Many do think it has not been taken as seriously as it ought to be given the significance of the harms it leads to.

So why would the government spend a single dollar on climate change when other more serious and more immediate problems are on fire?

Re: Greta Thunberg: 'How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood'

#64
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh no, a 16-year-old child with a basic understanding of climate change. This must be the work of the fucking Freemasons!

Why listen to a child, specifically, and not the scientists themselves? Unless it is another attempt to portrey kids as the symbol of purity and truth.

Are we only able to listen to one or the other?

Re: Greta Thunberg: 'How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood'

#65
post #6

The EU and USA are really doing quite well. She should be telling the rest of the world it's not enough: https://www.carbonbrief.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Fossi... I like it warmer though, where's my lobby? ;-)

Pretty much noone is doing "quite well". The goals of the Paris agreement are not within reach with the current measures. We need to half our emissions every 10 years! Saying "I like it warmer" just shows how poorly informed you are. Are you ok with all of the world's coral reefs dying? That's what were are going. These reefs are home to 25% of all species in the oceans!

I don't live on a coral reef.

Re: Greta Thunberg: 'How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood'

#66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Poverty, hunger, addiction, homelessness Most of which get worse w/climate change

Any reliable references indicating a causal effect? Thanks.

https://www.pnas.org/content/112/11/3241.short

You're welcome!

Re: Greta Thunberg: 'How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood'

#67
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why listen to a child, specifically, and not the scientists themselves? Unless it is another attempt to portrey kids as the symbol of purity and truth.

Are we only able to listen to one or the other?

There's nothing she can teach me about climate change over scientists.

Re: Greta Thunberg: 'How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood'

#68
post #59
post #15

Just a quick question: why Greta is not talking about world overpopulation? I think it's a huge problem. The more we are on this planet, the more mess we make. And by the way, it's too easy to shame western countries to be the root of all evil in this world.

Because there is no world overpopulation. People talk about overpopulation since ancient times. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_overpopulation#History_o... Currently standard of living are growing almost all over the world and human population is predicted to pick and stabilize at around 11 billion. I really recommend "DON'T PANIC — Hans Rosling showing the facts about population" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=…

What would be "overpopulation" by your definition? No way to grow enough food, resulting in mass famines? No physical space for people, even after tiling the planet with skyscrapers?

Or would "unsustainable carbon emissions and ecological damage" be enough? And if that's enough, aren't we already there today?

Re: Greta Thunberg: 'How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood'

#69
post #62
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because there is no world overpopulation. People talk about overpopulation since ancient times. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_overpopulation#History_o... Currently standard of living are growing almost all over the world and human population is predicted to pick and stabilize at around 11 billion. I really recommend "DON'T PANIC — Hans Rosling showing the facts about population" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=…

If the global population was still 2 billion as in the early 1900s, I'm certain we wouldn't have a climate crisis anywhere near the scale we're seeing today. We should be panicking, and I don't understand why our population should be allowed to grow until the Earth literally cannot sustain it. We're an intelligent and evolved species, and we'd all be better off exercising some self-control and keeping our population…

If we're going the totalitarian route, why not designate kids and force them to grow up to be scientists. Make them work for minimal wage on what are today billion dollar R&D, all for finding a solution to the so-called crisis? After all, human procreation is a naturally occuring event and it is the failure of science to produce a solution for the consequences and politicians - to adopt it.

Re: Greta Thunberg: 'How dare you? You have stolen my dreams and my childhood'

#70
post #62
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because there is no world overpopulation. People talk about overpopulation since ancient times. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_overpopulation#History_o... Currently standard of living are growing almost all over the world and human population is predicted to pick and stabilize at around 11 billion. I really recommend "DON'T PANIC — Hans Rosling showing the facts about population" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=…

If the global population was still 2 billion as in the early 1900s, I'm certain we wouldn't have a climate crisis anywhere near the scale we're seeing today. We should be panicking, and I don't understand why our population should be allowed to grow until the Earth literally cannot sustain it. We're an intelligent and evolved species, and we'd all be better off exercising some self-control and keeping our population…

Predicted population growth will have little to do with emission growth, because most of population growth will be happening in places where people don't have even access to electricity.

We, you and I, the top 10% richest people in the world are responsible for 50% of global emissions. Population of my home country is declining rapidly, I bet yours home country is as well.

Also let me ask you a nasty question, why should your right to exists trump someone else right to have children? Why don't you leave and make space for 10 children that will be born somewhere in Africa, that will probably emit less CO2 during their whole life than you already did?

Post reply on HN