Live data from Hacker News

Want 1.5TB of RAM in Your PC? It Will Cost You

zdnet.com

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: Want 1.5TB of RAM in Your PC? It Will Cost You

#61

I decided to put 32 GB of Ram in my home desktop some months back. I knew I didn’t need that much, but I figured macOS (it’s a Hackintosh) would use it for file caching or some such. To my disappointment, it goes completely unused more often than not. According to Activity Monitor, I currently have around 7 gb just sitting idle.

Does Activity Monitor report the page cache/UBC size? Most of the time, basically all of the memory I'm not using directly is filled with page cache. The other big thing large memory typically does for me is delay GC in the JVM. Typically the only time I use enough memory that my working files don't fit in the page cache along with the application memory, is when I build Android. It's possible you just don't have tha…

As of right now, 5.2 GB of RAM are being used for "Cached Files" according to Activity Monitor (still 25/32 GB in use overall).

Re: Want 1.5TB of RAM in Your PC? It Will Cost You

#62
From the experience with servers, having all DIMM slots populated(usually over two-thirds) clocks down the memory frequencies. Not something that you want for the maximum performance.

Its unclear what is this article about, yes large modules are expensive, but in DDR3 era 128gb dimms did not exist. You're paying the early adopter tax. If you want to get huge-ram systems for cheap, there are a lot of used 4-cpu servers, the whole system can be assembled for under $5k.

Post reply on HN