Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 69.0 Released

mozilla.org

61–70 of 331 posts

Re: Firefox 69.0 Released

#61

> For our users on Windows 10, you’ll see performance and UI improvements: > For our existing Windows 10 users, you can easily find and launch Firefox from a shortcut on the Win10 taskbar. ??? As opposed to before?!

I suspect that is their way of telling us that the installer now adds a taskbar shortcut.

Re: Firefox 69.0 Released

#62
post #24
post #3

Wait, Firefox Monitor? As in "allow us to store your email and password in case your email and password are pwned in some other site"? Does anyone else think this is prone to disaster, eventually?

It utilises K-anonymity, making it difficult if not impossible for this to become a massive data leak. The email gets hashed on your device, and the start of that hash is sent off to the server. The server returns a list of all the hashes that might match. The client then checks that list for complete matches.

Sounds fairly reasonable. I was already getting afraid of my private email addresses being leaked via this check.

Re: Firefox 69.0 Released

#64
post #15
post #7

> Firefox no longer loads userChrome.css or userContent.css by default improving start-up performance. Users who wish to customize Firefox by using these files can set the toolkit.legacyUserProfileCustomizations.stylesheets preference to true to restore this ability. How much of a performance improvement does this make?

I use userChrome.css and userContent.css, and I get the nagging feeling that the silent end of that sentence is "...when we eventually replace the code that currently enables user customization with faster, less flexible APIs." (I'm paranoid and FUDing because I care: there's some UX low hanging fruit before they could get rid of userChrome.css. For instance, you need userChrome.css to autohide the toolbar in full sc…

I mean, how slow could an "if file_exists()" check have been? This smells like deprecation to me, if the user CSS doesn't exist, don't load anything. Boom, no slowdown.

Re: Firefox 69.0 Released

#65

> macOS users on dual-graphics-card machines (like MacBook Pro) will switch back to the low-power GPU more aggressively, saving battery life. macOS user base can now consider FF as a viable browser alternative.

For me, not viable on macOS until they implement pinch to zoom.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688990

Edit: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/multi-touch-z... seems to help, though still not perfect.

Re: Firefox 69.0 Released

#66

> macOS users on dual-graphics-card machines (like MacBook Pro) will switch back to the low-power GPU more aggressively, saving battery life. macOS user base can now consider FF as a viable browser alternative.

My MBP doesn’t have a dedicated card and yet firefox manages to eat my battery as a snack

Re: Firefox 69.0 Released

#67
post #2

For our users in the US or using the en-US browser, we are shipping a new “New Tab” page experience that connects you to the best of Pocket’s content. Uhmmm...

I don't see anyone complaining that Safari has a built-in Reader feature. Safari even has "Siri Suggestions" almost identical to this Firefox experiment. Pocket has been acquired by Mozilla, so it's not a 3rd party feature any more. It's really no different.

It seems that some people are just used to hating Pocket as if it was some kind of tradition.

Re: Firefox 69.0 Released

#68
post #2

For our users in the US or using the en-US browser, we are shipping a new “New Tab” page experience that connects you to the best of Pocket’s content. Uhmmm...

Say what you will about Firefox, but they do make it super easy to disable this nonsense.

- Options -> Home -> Firefox Home Content -> Uncheck everything

I personally leave "Web Search" enabled, which gives a Chrome-like/minimalist experience.

Post reply on HN