Support for U2F security keys
61–70 of 164 posts
Re: Support for U2F security keys
#62I have long debated getting a Yubikey but have held off because I don't want to have to carry around several dongles at all times to be able to send an email. Surely other people are in the situation of: - iPhone, iPad - Macbook with only USB-C ports - Windows/Linux workstation with only USB-A ports Is there currently a non-cumbersome solution that will work on all of these?
A bluetooth capable U2F device like the Titan.
Details are available at https://security.googleblog.com/2019/05/titan-keys-update.ht...
Re: Support for U2F security keys
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
few providers support enrolling multiple yubikeys into your account.
Which don't? For all the big major ones I've used U2F with, they've supported multiple keys for a while (or since introduction). It's practically a requirement in case you lose a key.. To name a few off the top of my head: Google, GitHub, Gitlab, Facebook, 1Password, etc.
Re: Support for U2F security keys
#64Bitwarden has been fantastic, I highly recommend it.
Re: Support for U2F security keys
#65Re: Support for U2F security keys
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
The primary purpose of U2F/WebAuthn is to break phishing attacks. Code-based TOTP 2FA, the kind you're probably using now, is already adequate to the task of making sure you're not credential-stuffed.
Autofill of a password manager is a working countermeasure against phishing too: If autofill does not work there is something wrong and you should look closer...
Re: Support for U2F security keys
#67This looks awesome and I wish I could use it. Could you guys also consider bringing back the completely-offline mode that doesn't make my password manager depend on a 3rd party service? I'm prohibited by company policy from using my favorite password manager because of this.
Re: Support for U2F security keys
#68I have long debated getting a Yubikey but have held off because I don't want to have to carry around several dongles at all times to be able to send an email. Surely other people are in the situation of: - iPhone, iPad - Macbook with only USB-C ports - Windows/Linux workstation with only USB-A ports Is there currently a non-cumbersome solution that will work on all of these?
Re: Support for U2F security keys
#69I have long debated getting a Yubikey but have held off because I don't want to have to carry around several dongles at all times to be able to send an email. Surely other people are in the situation of: - iPhone, iPad - Macbook with only USB-C ports - Windows/Linux workstation with only USB-A ports Is there currently a non-cumbersome solution that will work on all of these?
The way $dayjob makes this work is to issue a nano security key for each computer, and then a bluetooth security key for the iPhone (Android phones can use both NFC and Bluetooth security keys, but iPhones can only use Bluetooth security keys). It's cumbersome, but less so than when we were plugging and unplugging our one hardware USB-A OTP token into everything (and using a desktop web browser to generate OTPs for t…
You’d then have to contact support to let you bypass 2FA, but if that’s possible then the 2FA protection is weak, prone to social hacking.
Re: Support for U2F security keys
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
few providers support enrolling multiple yubikeys into your account.
Which don't? For all the big major ones I've used U2F with, they've supported multiple keys for a while (or since introduction). It's practically a requirement in case you lose a key.. To name a few off the top of my head: Google, GitHub, Gitlab, Facebook, 1Password, etc.