Live data from Hacker News

GCHQ Cracks Frank Sidebottom's Codes

bbc.co.uk

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: GCHQ Cracks Frank Sidebottom's Codes

#61
post #60
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For that you simply need to have the sudden inspiration of how the scheme works. Snark aside, I don't think that discarding half of the source material as random junk is such an obvious thing to do.

You could easily think, 'hey perhaps the outside triangles are different from the inside ones, lets make a histogram of the symbols in both.' From there, you'd certainly notice if one side had a lot more symbols than the other side. Trying to analyze both separately is a decent next step, and we are well along to solving this.

That's not something a normal human would easily think. I doubt an experienced God breaker would have, easily thought your suggestion. But don't worry, go on telling yourself it's something you would have easily thought.

Re: GCHQ Cracks Frank Sidebottom's Codes

#62
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is also the word for a paedophile which is pretty unfortunate. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/nonce

Cue the old protest that "root" means something vulgar in Australia, and so the Unix superuser should be named something else. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/root#Etymology_2

[deleted]
Post reply on HN