Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The point is the same. If an action is deservedly shameful, then so be it. The point is different because censure (as we're using it here) judges the action but shaming judges the person . Censure: "That thing that you did was bad." Shaming: "You are a bad person for doing that thing."
No, you are arbitrarily deciding that "shaming judges the person," and that shaming means, "You are a bad person." That's what you think it means. You do not get to decide what "shaming" means to everyone, and it's not right for you to tell others what "shaming" means to them. Besides that, even if one thinks that shaming does "judge the person," that's not necessarily bad, either, because rightful shame can lead to…
[deleted]