Live data from Hacker News

Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

bugs.chromium.org

61–70 of 779 posts

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#61
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Me too.

Same. I've already been on the fence but this would be the last straw.

Silly me, did I just say "me"? That'll be me and my customers (probably not enough to make much of a dent in the stats but rather more than a few users)

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

iOS might not support Firefox addons, but you can use a system wide ad block app with Firefox.

The "system wide adblock" on iOS has the same restrictions as this new Chrome extension system. It does not support the extension API that uBlock Origin uses. https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/Ge...

Not versed in the technical details but 1Blocker X for iOS Safari has prevented practically 99.9% of all ads I used to see in an unmodded Android Chrome before. I've only seen 2 websites have some form of ads in the last 14 months.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#64

Another reason to be glad that Firefox is still standing.

I really just don't understand the obsession with Chrome, especially in hacker communities. Sorry Google, I feel "icky & gross" when I use you.

It fast. That most important thing.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#65
post #17

Ouch, I understand why they want to not have a blocking webRequest API but I consider uBlock Origin to be a must-have extension. Hopefully this is relaxed somehow. I personally still use Firefox at home despite recent issues, but I honestly would prefer having both as an option, plus I always recommend uBlock Origin to everyone. (Disclaimer: I work at Google but not on Chrome, opinions are mine and not my employer's.…

Have there been recent issues? I've been using Firefox consistently for years and lately it seems better than usual.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#66

Used to love google, for many many years. Slowly starting to despise them, though. It's different for everyone, but for me it started with this gmail redesign that made the product so slow it's almost worthless to me. And worst of all is I feel like there isn't even a good competing service to switch to. And now Chrome...

The comments in the linked thread don't really go into why this change was made, but I think Google deserves the benefit of the doubt that the proposal was made in an effort to improve other aspects of the browser (speed or maintainability, for example)

No sane person should give Google the benefit of the doubt, triply so when it comes to ads and ad-blocking.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#67

Used to love google, for many many years. Slowly starting to despise them, though. It's different for everyone, but for me it started with this gmail redesign that made the product so slow it's almost worthless to me. And worst of all is I feel like there isn't even a good competing service to switch to. And now Chrome...

I switched to protonmail a few months back, and have been very happy with the service. They focus on privacy and security as a core value. They have a limited free account (limited in terms of storage space and message volume), so not a direct replacement for gmail. I use the paid service for more storage and a custom domain.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#68

Has anyone considered they are trying to do something good here? Publishers are dying left and right...ads support a lot of good businesses!

Sure, but the plague of dark patterns and intrusive ads far far outweigh the few legitimately non intrusive ad supported websites. I agree there needs to be some way for sites to make money, but there is just too much stuff out there that should be blocked.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#69
post #20
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Recent versions have improved hugely. Have you tried them?

I don’t trust the Mozilla Corporation. Putting ads on my home page a few weeks ago was the last straw. But if Google does this, that’ll be almost worse. https://venturebeat.com/2018/12/31/mozilla-ad-on-firefoxs-ne... It’s funny when you think of it, now both browsers want to shove ads down my throat. I hate the modern internet.

I agree that ads aren't a great solution, but the entire reason Mozilla is doing things like that is to avoid having all their revenue (and thus their existence) dependent on Google. How else do you think they should make money?

It's also worth pointing out that the included ads are targeted locally on your computer, and none of your browsing data gets sent to Mozilla (https://help.getpocket.com/article/1142-firefox-new-tab-reco...).

And it's also really easy to turn them off (preferences > home > "sponsored stories").

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#70

I don't understand the technical details of this - could someone explain it to an idiot? - Is the change specifically to block ad blockers, or uBlock specifically? Or is it just a new extension API? - Could ad blockers adapt to the new version to work again? I am reminded of the new version of (Mac) Safari, which features a new extensions API. It took a while for them to appear but there are now good ad blocking exte…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN