Live data from Hacker News

Quitting Amazon 5 months after I started

medium.com

61–70 of 149 posts

Re: Quitting Amazon 5 months after I started

#61
In his post he talks about how he doesn't want to talk about money. I'd rather tell them I need $200/hr up front in the first email then to have to go through all their time wasting interviews and find out they aren't going to pay what I need.

Re: Quitting Amazon 5 months after I started

#63

I work at Amazon. Was hired in at L4 and promoted to L5 within one year, which is a little early, but not by much. I think 18 months is typical. I want to say that I like their promotion process. It’s designed to be transparent and owned by the employee. I’d much rather have an ongoing conversation with my manager, using the doc as an excuse, that keeps the conversation on how close I am and exactly what I need to do…

One of the best comments so far. Thank for taking your time and writing it! Good luck at Amazon!

Re: Quitting Amazon 5 months after I started

#64
post #23

This was the least convincing blog post on this sort of topic that I've read. I didn't see anything that actually painted Amazon in a very bad light. I think anyone should expect bureaucracy to be a major problem at a large company. Complaining about promotions seems a bit unfair since he was only there for 5 months. Moreover, I saw quite a few senior engineers and discovered that I do not want to be alike… This is o…

Thanks for your comment! To be fair, I didn't try to convince you - I was sharing my experiences and observations :) Most chances the article is not as good as others, I am not a writer (otherwise I wouldn't have a problem with writing a promotion document) :)

I didn't intend my lack of conviction entirely as a criticism.

At this point, I've read enough blog posts about leaving FAANG companies and they all paint a picture that makes me sure that I wouldn't want to work there.

This blog post didn't change anything in my mind about employment at Amazon, which was surprising in it's own way. It was an experience to read because it was different than what I expected.

It's like if you're reading stories from people who were tortured and you're cringing at every twist of the knife. Then one story is about being given paper cuts and you don't cringe at all. (not that it is a fair metaphor for something that may affect your career/livelihood like Amazon)

Re: Quitting Amazon 5 months after I started

#65
post #9

I was super happy with Amazon for 6 years or so. Compensated well, worked hard but fairly (and rarely more than 40-45 hours a week), great peers, good managers, and plenty of interesting work to do. I eventually left because Amazon restricted building games in my spare time with my friends. I just wanted to jam on the weekends on something that would never ship as a creative outlet. Turns out they have a policy that…

no one owns your time outside of work except you, unless they want to pay you for it.

Re: Quitting Amazon 5 months after I started

#66
post #18

This is the quote that stands out to me: > You won’t be promoted for doing your job, you will be promoted by focusing on your promotion. Well, yeah. That's how it is in a lot of companies, especially big ones. Doing what is expected of you in your current position is proof that you are well suited for your current position. Exceeding expectations for your current position is how you get promoted. If the company has a…

Thanks for pointing that out! I was frustrated by the expectation to focus on documenting to get a promotion. I don't think it is a good practice and was surprised to see that: > focusing on that process (promotion) is not a distraction from doing your job: it is doing your job! Seems like you understanding of "doing job" is different. To make it clear - I used to be promoted by helping a business grow - complete act…

Keep in mind Israeli culture is very different from Canadian culture which in turn is yet a little different than USA culture. I can totally see where you're coming from (as someone who came to Vancouver with a cat just about 16 years ago).

There are much better places to work for in Vancouver (my opinion :). Hopefully you'll land in one (should have landed that before leaving Amazon :) ). There are definitely places with better management and where good work is noticed. That said you need to be aware of the cultural differences and that things work differently than the way you're used to. I was really lucky in terms of landing in a place with good culture and a team that I really got along with, but still there were culture clashes initially (and probably to some degree still are).

Anyways, good luck at work and surviving the grey winter ;) Let me know how to get in touch if you're interested in some more local advice.

Re: Quitting Amazon 5 months after I started

#67

This was the least convincing blog post on this sort of topic that I've read. I didn't see anything that actually painted Amazon in a very bad light. I think anyone should expect bureaucracy to be a major problem at a large company. Complaining about promotions seems a bit unfair since he was only there for 5 months. Moreover, I saw quite a few senior engineers and discovered that I do not want to be alike… This is o…

I thought the part where they offered him an SDE I position despite his 10 years of experience was pretty bad.

It does seem like standard policy among tech companies though. I came to the US to work for Microsoft (I'm no longer there) as a level 59 (lowest SDE level), despite having almost 6 years of experience at that point. My wife (an SDET) had even more experience than me (she was a Senior SDET before we moved here) and when she got a job her company did the same thing.

Re: Quitting Amazon 5 months after I started

#68
post #18

This is the quote that stands out to me: > You won’t be promoted for doing your job, you will be promoted by focusing on your promotion. Well, yeah. That's how it is in a lot of companies, especially big ones. Doing what is expected of you in your current position is proof that you are well suited for your current position. Exceeding expectations for your current position is how you get promoted. If the company has a…

Thanks for pointing that out! I was frustrated by the expectation to focus on documenting to get a promotion. I don't think it is a good practice and was surprised to see that: > focusing on that process (promotion) is not a distraction from doing your job: it is doing your job! Seems like you understanding of "doing job" is different. To make it clear - I used to be promoted by helping a business grow - complete act…

> I was frustrated by the expectation to focus on documenting to get a promotion. I don't think it is a good practice and was surprised to see that:

This was apparently a relatively recent change. Until about a year ago, apparently managers wrote this document. Previous feedback that the promotion process seemed random, obscure, and allowed favoritism resulted in this change being made, where employees are involved in writing their promotion document.

However, the intention isn't to focus more on documenting your promotion than doing the right things.

At least in our office, senior management is aware of the problems that have been introduced, and trying to find solutions.

> Not by writing self-promotional documents.

If you think the most important thing for promotion is writing your promotion document, you have either been misled by your manager, or you have fallen into a trap.

> Unfortunately, it is not by "exceeding", but documenting that you have exceeded, and knowing how to document it right, sometimes not really exceeding at all.

In my experience, this is not true.

I have sat in promotion reviews where the manager was told to write the employee's promotion doc for them, because it wasn't worth it to frustrate an good employee who doesn't find time to write his own promotion document.

I am sorry that you had a bad experience at Amazon, but your experience doesn't match mine or any of the colleagues at our office that I know well enough to gauge their job satisfaction etc. However, a lot of your sentiments have been reported to arise in junior employees (who seem to focus too much on reaching promotion instead of on developing themselves).

Your case may have been different because you seem to have had a bad hiring experience, where you should have been hired as an SDEII, not an SDEI. But, your manager should have sorted this out for you (by doing the work to fast-track your promotion without letting you do all the document-writing). Either you had a bad manager, or you didn't discuss this with your manager adequately.

I think it is unfair for you to judge the whole company based on what seems to be one bad manager.

Re: Quitting Amazon 5 months after I started

#69

20% coding is very sad. I hate to think how many great minds are being wasted this way. After starting work at a startup, I feel more fulfilled in my daily life. I can easily say I spend around 80-90% of my time coding and feel I contribute much more than I ever did at any of these jobs.

20% does sound sad but 80-90% is not very realist if you are working on a project involving several people working for several years.

Re: Quitting Amazon 5 months after I started

#70
This isn't a very good rant, and I'm not sure I respect the author's decision (though ultimately of course it's a very personal one so we have to respect that).

From his essay ... Amazon seems like reasonably well run large company by most standards.

The author maybe doesn't seem to grasp that large teams doing big things don't seem hugely efficient.

The bit about the Canada/US border trip was rich, they're trying to get stuff done, it's not like their flagrantly in violation of anything.

"My manager told me it is trust that I yet to earn — people don’t trust my judgement and I need to build good relationships with decision makers. I agreed. But that what is called “politics”. "

It's often in addition to politics, but it's not just politics.

Trust, relationships, competency - those are real things.

Surely some people don't want to work at large organizations, but the author I believe maybe needs some experience to grasp that this is what it means.

I would say to the author: welcome to how it is.

I think the author should have stuck it out for a couple of more years, they might have learned a lot before doing something much more aspirational.

Post reply on HN