Earlier quoted context omitted.
Soup as a dish, or the etymology of the word "soup"? Because soup as a dish predates recorded history certainly[1] (evidence found for it as far back as 20,0000 BC) but possibly even the modern human species. And if the dish is that old and universal, every culture would have its own name for it. "supa" and "soup" sounding similar is probably just a coincidence. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soup
it is not just similar sounds ctrl f supa in the link above i believe the dish described is basically the same and the arthashastra in any case outclasses all other attestations even if you take western dating the pushback on this etymology is seemingly more than even for the word cash which is also an indian word but the english would even prefer to credit the french for it than indians french caisse is a tangential…
"Basically the same" as what? "Soup" is a very broad term encompassing many, many dishes.
> and the arthashastra in any case outclasses all other attestations even if you take western dating
The Arthashastra is supposedly from the 2nd century BCE[1], but even if it's as old as Sanskrit itself[2], it still comes at least 15,000 years after the first evidence of soup. Soup is older than any language that's known today. Why would other cultures suddenly start using a Sanskrit word for a food that they've known and enjoyed for thousands of years?