Earlier quoted context omitted.
They certainly should be used for different purposes, but currently I don't see why PDF is necessary for all the papers. Why do they need fixed layout? Plenty of them are already published in both PDF and HTML, what's different about the rest? It's especially baffling in the case of computer science and programming papers when the contents are the same as in blogs. I have dozens of PDFs in my reading queue, for which…
PDF is for printing and for (well, with the exception of a few edge cases) guaranteeing a layout and display given a set of paper dimensions. HTML has the advantage of responsiveness, but the inherent problem of variable output. When I was a professor and advising my students on creating portfolios, I told them to build websites of course. But I told them to also have a link to a one-page PDF because many organizatio…
If you want to have your document printed nicely, just prepare it for printing along with other methods of output. The best way to do it is to not use some crazy layout: have a single column with images between paragraphs, and your documents will look fine on any device. All problems of reformatting documents stem from the rigid two-dimensional layout mentality, while the flexible approach requires stepping back to the one-dimensional semantic flow.
(Actually, standard paper formats were never around, because—surprise—my country doesn't use US paper formats.)