Live data from Hacker News

F.C.C. Repeals Net Neutrality Rules

nytimes.com

61–70 of 1001 posts

Re: F.C.C. Repeals Net Neutrality Rules

#61

If you voted for Trump, this one's on you.

He did run on "drain the swamp" which meant getting rid of people that do things like this. The problem is that people believed him.

A lot of politicians go to Washington wanting to drain the swamp. They quickly discover that it isn't a swamp. It's a jacuzzi with free champaign.

Re: F.C.C. Repeals Net Neutrality Rules

#62
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Non-voters / people on the “there’s no difference” train also deserve a moment of reflection about whether their reality is true.

I abstained from voting. I'm still happy with my decision. People actually care about politics again [1]. Maybe next time don't railroad my candidate (Sanders) during the primaries. I will never vote for a neoliberal or corporate Democratic candidate, even if you hold my country hostage. [1] Alabama has a Democratic state senator for the first time in decades.

I killed a man in Reno, just to watch their family start caring about the justice system!

Re: F.C.C. Repeals Net Neutrality Rules

#64

If you voted for Trump, this one's on you.

He did run on "drain the swamp" which meant getting rid of people that do things like this. The problem is that people believed him.

Yes, they believed him. Despite numerous examples from his history that he shouldn't be believed.

Re: F.C.C. Repeals Net Neutrality Rules

#65
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Non-voters / people on the “there’s no difference” train also deserve a moment of reflection about whether their reality is true.

I abstained from voting. I'm still happy with my decision. People actually care about politics again [1]. Maybe next time don't railroad my candidate (Sanders) during the primaries. I will never vote for a neoliberal or corporate Democratic candidate, even if you hold my country hostage. [1] Alabama has a Democratic state senator for the first time in decades.

Do you feel that you care about politics if you aren't making your voice heard by voting?

Re: F.C.C. Repeals Net Neutrality Rules

#67
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Non-voters / people on the “there’s no difference” train also deserve a moment of reflection about whether their reality is true.

No. Give me a candidate worth voting for, and I will vote. The current "pick the lesser of two shitheads" is ridiculous. Both parties in the US are to blame. The two party system in the US today means that voting for anyone that is not a Democrat or Republican is a complete waste of time.

You could have voted for Evan McMullin, a CIA officer for over 10 years and all around stand up dude. There were plenty of other candidates. If you threw your hands up and did not vote, you're part of the problem. Period.

Re: F.C.C. Repeals Net Neutrality Rules

#69
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Non-voters / people on the “there’s no difference” train also deserve a moment of reflection about whether their reality is true.

I abstained from voting. I'm still happy with my decision. People actually care about politics again [1]. Maybe next time don't railroad my candidate (Sanders) during the primaries. I will never vote for a neoliberal or corporate Democratic candidate, even if you hold my country hostage. [1] Alabama has a Democratic state senator for the first time in decades.

Alabama's new Democratic Senator won because the choice was literally "this guy or a pedophile?" That seat'll almost certainly go overwhelmingly red again in 2020. Sessions won the seat in 2014 with 97.3% of the vote.

There's probably a Democratic wave happening nationally, but the Alabama special election is really poor evidence to use for it.

Re: F.C.C. Repeals Net Neutrality Rules

#70
post #22

Edit: You know what, fuck it. I don't think I can say anything here that hasn't been said a thousand times already.

Most people don't fit into either party's value system. I hardly think boiling it down to R vs D is going to help anyone, we need to inform our populous.

Despite how my above comment appears, I really don't want to turn this into partisan shit-flinging. I am no Democrat, I fall well to the left of where they live, and I disagree about gun rights and a number of other things.

That being said, I think it's pretty clear that more harmful policies proposed in recent times have come predominantly from a single source, and I think it's more important to work in opposition to that harmfulness than to find a group that perfectly represents you. Especially with a first past the post electoral system in which fractiousness dilutes the value of your vote.

Post reply on HN