Earlier quoted context omitted.
For me my test for multivariable calculus text is their treatment of the chain rule. If the book says something like “derivative of a composition is the composition of the derivatives” it’s good. If they instead say something involving a sigma and things like ∂f/∂x ∂x/∂t it’s likely bad.
What do you mean by "derivative of a composition is the composition of the derivatives"?
So basically the chain rule states that if you have two functions F, G composed together and you want to find the derivative (the linearized approximation), you simply compute the linearized function for both F and G, and compose the linearized version afterwards.
You can read the Wikipedia article on the chain rule and it eventually gives this simple and elegant formula for the chain rule: https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/8b0f...
But the unfortunate reality is that too many textbooks formulate the chain rule in such a complicated manner that it obscures the simplicity and elegance of the chain rule.