May I know why it's flagged? @Dan or some other person
Google has not in fact, forked Swift. So there's no news here, just FUD.
Google forked Swift
61–70 of 78 posts
Re: Google forked Swift
#62Hi! I’m one of the engineers on this. We’ve got some work we’re collaborating on - all of which is going upstream - and we wanted a shared place to stage it while we prepare PRs. I’ll be pushing a statement to our fork tomorrow. (I’m personally working on Bazel rules and contributions to lib/Syntax. If you find that exciting, please get in touch! :)
I do not think this is the process. You should raise proposal to swift community and if it gets accepted you start working on it. Not other way around. You create fork and try to push and if they does not agree with you. You will say ok we are having our own fork.
From the heading I misunderstood google has forked the swift. I was little bit hurt, google always do same thing like they took WebKit and forked it and made it own version of browser instead of contributing back to webkit.
Facebook people also contribute to Swift but Facebook has no fork in their repository instead the person who contributes have in their own repo.
I have read somewhere steve jobs was very unhappy with this event and that is the reason they make their technologies close.
Swift is hard work of lot of people and Swift community, I really love the openness it brings in Apple. These types of incidents make them to rethink their decision and let developers like us to not involve in their choices.
Chris Lattner has done wonderful job to make community like this and if google misuse and made their own language out of hard work of swift community I do not think it is good for any of us.
I read google have not forked so I take my comment back as I cannot delete it.
Thanks HN
Re: Google forked Swift
#63Why is this flagged?
Re: Google forked Swift
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Made-up title? Github says "google/swift forked from apple/swift". Is that wrong?
Yes, just like putting 'President nukes turkey' would be silly thing to put in a newspaper if the president warmed up some turkey in a microwave.
I see your point. Thank you for your opinion, and I don't agree. Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15701539 for why.
Re: Google forked Swift
#65Why is this flagged?
I guess that title is little controversial. For people unfamiliar with GitHub process it may sound like Google prepares their own version of Swift (which is not a case as explained in the top comment).
Re: Google forked Swift
#66Should change the title to "Google has a fork of Swift"
Does it feel differently? "fork" as a noun and a verb?
No offense, just a question. Because I'm not a native English speaker.
Re: Google forked Swift
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe you should have tried to find out what this is about before posting it with a completely made up title?
It's not a "made up title", Google did in fact fork Swift on GitHub. That doesn't mean anything in an of itself, thousands of people/organizations have also done so, but it's mildly interesting since it's Google, and because it was posted here, we now know why. Don't see a problem.
The problem is that "fork" means two different things at this point. Compare "FFmpeg developers fork FFmpeg" in the sense of "...and create libav" and in the sense of "...so they can submit pull requests." One is extremely newsworthy, one is extremely not. If you're posting something to HN, it's a reasonable assumption that readers will think you're posting a newsworthy thing as opposed to not.
Re: Google forked Swift
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, just like putting 'President nukes turkey' would be silly thing to put in a newspaper if the president warmed up some turkey in a microwave.
I see your point. Thank you for your opinion, and I don't agree. Please see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15701539 for why.
No, that doesn't make sense. You didn't think they merely made a github clone - as you yourself said above, you thought Google was going to make their own version of the language. You posted suggesting that they are. But it wasn't true. People working at Google had to correct you. Other users flagged your post into oblivion. Those thing wouldn't have happened if the title wasn't wildly inaccurate. You should have tried to find out if it was, instead of posting an inaccurate thing on HN.
Re: Google forked Swift
#69https://twitter.com/clattner_llvm/status/930832426548436992
Swift at Google has enough folks working on it that we need a staging ground/integration point, and we decided it should be public.
Re: Google forked Swift
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
I do not think this is the process. You should raise proposal to swift community and if it gets accepted you start working on it. Not other way around. You create fork and try to push and if they does not agree with you. You will say ok we are having our own fork.
From the heading I misunderstood google has forked the swift. I was little bit hurt, google always do same thing like they took WebKit and forked it and made it own version of browser instead of contributing back to webkit. Facebook people also contribute to Swift but Facebook has no fork in their repository instead the person who contributes have in their own repo. I have read somewhere steve jobs was very unhappy w…
Ish thats the point of open source. Its not misusing a project to fork it and build something new off of it. WebKit itself was originally a fork.