It's not that simple. I have a steel string guitar which, when a string is stuck loudly, will play sharp, then asymptotically approach the Hz it has when sounding its quietest. I hear it, and my digital tuner displays the effect as well. I speculate that when the the string is more perturbed (arced further away from straight), the tension increases more than proportionately to the displacement from straight.
New oscillator system in Zenith mechanical watches
61–67 of 67 posts
Re: New oscillator system in Zenith mechanical watches
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want a watch with a neat movement that is widely available, get a Swatch Sistem 51. Granted it has 5x as many moving parts as the Zenith Defy Lab, but it is actually affordable and pretty neat.
Although Watch Guy [0] was not amused... [0] http://watchguy.co.uk/review-a-trip-inside-the-swatch-sistem...
Re: New oscillator system in Zenith mechanical watches
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
At the heart of every mechanical watch lies a coiled spring. Within that spring energy is stored that wants to be released. This energy is released through the wheel train, which is a set of cogs with reductions (some of them attached to the hands). Left to its own device this system would just spin as quickly as possible until the spring is unwound. To prevent this, somewhere in the train there is something called a…
I understand (roughly!) the basic idea of a watch mechanism, and how mechanical escapements work. What i don't understand is exactly how the spring drive keeps the wheel moving at a constant speed . I appreciate that this involves magnets, and eddy currents induced by those magnets, but that's a description, not an explanation. What is the mechanism, physically and mathemetically, that keeps the speed constant?
"that a voltage is induced in a circuit whenever relative motion exists between a conductor and a magnetic field and that the magnitude of this voltage is proportional to the rate of change of the flux".
The magnetic field here is attached to the glide wheel (rotor). The conductor is some stationary spools placed near the glide wheel. This means the voltage output depends on how fast the glide wheel spins (rate of change of the flux).
The other part of Springdrive comes from Lenz’s Law of Electromagnetic Induction:
"the direction of an induced electro magnetic field is such that it will always opposes the change that is causing it"
That means that the current creates a electromagnetic field of its own that opposes the changes in the magnetic field that caused it.
So that opposing field depends on the rate of flux according to Faraday. That rate of flux directly correlates to the passage of time (the spinning of the glide wheel).
By adjusting the placement and configuration of the circuit (the spools) we can influence the flux, thereby influence the induced voltage, thereby influence the induced magnetic field that opposes the change that is causing it, which is the spinning of the rotor that correlates to the passage of time, to a degree that hopefully is around 1 second per second (or 1 rotation of the glidewheel per 1/8 second).
Note that if the glide wheel accelerates for some reason, the change of flux changes, the voltage changes, and the opposing magnetic field increases, forcing the speed of the glide wheel down. On the other hand, if the glide wheel slows down, the opposing magnetic field decreases and allows the glide wheel to spin faster.
So technically the "smooth" second hand isn't smooth at all, but slows down or speeds up about 8 times a second, so it's not exactly "at a constant speed," but since it's not a start-stop motion, it sure looks smooth to an observer.
Re: New oscillator system in Zenith mechanical watches
#64I am a long-time watch nut, and I loved this write-up - it concisely explained what makes this mechanism unique and was most educational. Fun to see a departure from the norm - until this, the probably largest innovation horology over the past couple of hundred years was George Daniels' coaxial escapement (which basically eliminated friction from the equation, ensuring all transfer of energy in the escapement took pl…
A lot of people in the company didn't want to use the new escapement, but they needed a new selling point. Plus--why fix something that isn't broken? Their watches seldom need to be opened for at least ten years. I have a Omega Constellation, with the standard escapement, that hasent been opened in 15 plus years, and keeps time within seconds per day.
Many of the coaxial escapements had problems. It's not clear why. I believe the problems were watches produced on the first run?
I have an Omega with the coaxial, and many with standard escapement. My coaxial keeps the same time as the my other Omegas. Actually, it's not as accurate. I hate to say this because it's a $3500 watch.
The jury is still out on wether the coaxial escapement is any better than a standard two jewel pallet fork. The coaxial has three jewels, and a unconventional pallet fork.
In fact, their are guys like myself, who actively seek out Seamasters without the coaxial escapement.
My point is different, more complex isn't necessarily better. Sometimes the new design just adds more failure points to a movement. The coaxial escapement hasen't been around long enough to claim superiority. As to repairability, it's definetly more work to service. Why--Omega keeps its service manuals locked away, like all the rest of the high end watch companies. In the end, they want you to send in that watch to the factory when the time comes, and you will be charged factory prices for a wash, oil, and buffing. You will receive a fat ding on your credit card for that service.
In the long run, when you can't take a watch to whomever you want for repair/parts; you really don't own said watch. You are essentially leasing the watch. Again--you buy a Omega with your hard earned money. Even if you have the skills to work on the watch, you can't call up Omega and order a spare anything. They will politely tell you to take it back to the overpriced boutique, and they will send it in, and you will pay through the nose.
I'm tired now of writing. I do like George Daniels though. I wish someone would do an autobiography on the man.
A couple more things about watches, and their subsequent service. Service it when it stops working, or doesn't keep the correct time. If it's in the water, you need to have it serviced at their intervals. Buy a demagnitizer. And I forgot the other thing I was going to say. Anyways, for the money, you can't go wrong with any Omega--vintage, or new. I've looked at new/old Rolexes, and Omegas under a microscope, and I can't tell a difference in quality of parts, or engineering.
Re: New oscillator system in Zenith mechanical watches
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
EMP resistance. This isn't exactly a practical justification for most uses, of course.
Would they be resistant to EMP, surely you've got lots of possibility for induced currents that will warp/melt fine components sufficiently to damage the watch? A sundial is what you need.