Live data from Hacker News

Darknet Messenger Briar Releases Beta, Passes Security Audit

briarproject.org

61–70 of 90 posts

Re: Darknet Messenger Briar Releases Beta, Passes Security Audit

#63

Can someone explain how it deals with routers and NAT ? Does it use UDP hole punching ?

The app hosts a Tor hidden service which other peers can connect to. No NAT punch through required as Tor will relay messages instead of a direct P2P connection.

Re: Darknet Messenger Briar Releases Beta, Passes Security Audit

#65

"Darknet" is a brainwashing propaganda term. Please do not use it, thanks.

What is the right term then?

Difficult to know in this context - what meaning do you think they weed trying to convey, assuming that “designed for illegal use” wasn't it.

Re: Darknet Messenger Briar Releases Beta, Passes Security Audit

#66
post #2

Feedback: darknet has come to mean places where you go buy drugs online, not p2p applications generally.

Does it? I know it has that meaning on the evening news, but even on network television it means something like "the secret internet where crazy stuff is". I mostly hear it used to mean what it is supposed to mean, but that is rarely from non-technical people.

What is it supposed to mean?

Re: Darknet Messenger Briar Releases Beta, Passes Security Audit

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is the right term then?

Difficult to know in this context - what meaning do you think they weed trying to convey, assuming that “designed for illegal use” wasn't it.

How about "secure against spying by governments and criminals".

Re: Darknet Messenger Briar Releases Beta, Passes Security Audit

#68
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Difficult to know in this context - what meaning do you think they weed trying to convey, assuming that “designed for illegal use” wasn't it.

How about "secure against spying by governments and criminals".

So 'highly secure' would be better than darknet

Re: Darknet Messenger Briar Releases Beta, Passes Security Audit

#70
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You could also see it the other way around, your application is not secure enough if terrorists, dissidents, drug dealers, whistleblowers and child pornographers don't feel confident to use it. Look at Tor.

From an ethical point of view building this software must be difficult. On one hand you are building something that advances technology and could be used to help free people from an oppressive government, on the other hand you are also building something that could be used (and if it works most likely will be used) to aid acts that we all agree are morally wrong.

Pick almost any technology, even outside of computers. You could make the exact same statement. I don't see the ethical problem.
Post reply on HN