Why are people so welcoming to the filthy spies invading citizen privacy?
Some of the are defending against other filthy spies.
Down With All The Filthy Spies!
NSA OSS Technologies
61–70 of 114 posts
Re: NSA OSS Technologies
#62Why are people so welcoming to the filthy spies invading citizen privacy?
I really don't understand it, to be honest I think it's unbelievable. I'd say we, as in the IT community, shouldn't touch anything coming out of the NSA with a 10 feet pole, even if we're absolutely sure it's not some kind of morally dubious attack tool. Fuck the NSA!
YES
These assholes are hoping the OSS community contributes back to reduce our own privacy! wtf
> The government benefits from the open source community’s enhancements to the technology.
Re: NSA OSS Technologies
#63"THE TECHNOLOGIES LISTED BELOW were developed within the National Security Agency (NSA) "
OK, moving along, is there some secure software somewhere in there?
Re: NSA OSS Technologies
#64Femto ( https://github.com/femto-dev/femto ) looks pretty interesting to me just based on some work I've needed to do in the past that it would've come in handy for. It looks like the last commit was over a year ago, though. Is there information I'm not seeing of whether these projects are actively maintained (or still in use at NSA?).
Im also curious, without digging into it deeply is it something comparable to Solr or Elasticsearch? If so i wonder how it stacks up
Re: NSA OSS Technologies
#65Fun sidenote: I was the very first civilian to contribute to their GitHub project back in July 2015, when SIMP was the only project they had up on GitHub. It was literally a one letter change in the README file, but I still have the privilege to call myself the very first civilian to contribute to the NSA's open source project: https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/SIMP/pull/1
great job collaborating with what is, in essence; the American version of the Stasi.
But with much better pr.
Re: NSA OSS Technologies
#66I've trialed Apache Nifi and it's very powerful. It's also a little unsettling as you use it thinking about how the NSA used it ...
No wonder Hortonworks wanted to integrate it.
Re: NSA OSS Technologies
#67Does the fact that many of these havent been updated in months or years mean that these are really old projects that effectively hold no value to the NSA and arent close to any of their core operations?
Re: NSA OSS Technologies
#68Fun sidenote: I was the very first civilian to contribute to their GitHub project back in July 2015, when SIMP was the only project they had up on GitHub. It was literally a one letter change in the README file, but I still have the privilege to call myself the very first civilian to contribute to the NSA's open source project: https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/SIMP/pull/1
great job collaborating with what is, in essence; the American version of the Stasi.
From the Stasi's wikipedia page:
"Numerous Stasi officials were prosecuted for their crimes after 1990. After German reunification, the surveillance files that the Stasi had maintained on millions of East Germans were laid open, so that any citizen could inspect their personal file on request; these files are now maintained by the Federal Commissioner for the Stasi Records."
I wonder if that will ever happen in the US.
Re: NSA OSS Technologies
#69Fun sidenote: I was the very first civilian to contribute to their GitHub project back in July 2015, when SIMP was the only project they had up on GitHub. It was literally a one letter change in the README file, but I still have the privilege to call myself the very first civilian to contribute to the NSA's open source project: https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/SIMP/pull/1
Calling that a contribution is retarded. grow up
Re: NSA OSS Technologies
#70Why are people so welcoming to the filthy spies invading citizen privacy?
Grumping about it on hackernews doesn't really do anything either... it's the same as Facebook thoughts and prayers posts and clicking like to send well wishes to victims of the latest disaster. There is no better example of the IT community feeling strenuously about something and the general public just not caring than privacy. The Cypherpunks were tolling the privacy bell nearly thirty years ago and were on the cover of Wired, which is pretty mainstream for a topic like this. Nothing happened and without a very different mindset in the public I don't think anything ever will.
This being hackernews I'd like to turn the conversation to something more constructive: the idea of whether the coder doing the work is just doing a job or should feel culpability and suffer the consequences of working for "the bad guys" has probably come up in many places. Heck someone could probably write a Master's thesis on whether "Evil Scotty" in Mirror, Mirror was actually evil. I mean he did keep the torture booths running for Evil Kirk, but he also helped the good guys get back to their parallel universe.
So, seriously - do we feel the IT guys working at places like No Such Agency are forever unclean or are they just doing a job? Clerks never settled the issue...
>Randal: There was something else going on in Jedi. I ever noticed it till today. They build another Death Star, right?
>Dante: Yeah.
>Randal: Now, the first one was completed and fully operational before the Rebel's destroyed it.
>Dante: Luke blew it up. Give credit where credit is due.
>Randal: And the second one was still being built when the blew it up.
>Dante: Compliments to Lando Calrissian.
>Randal: Something just never sat right with me that second time around. I could never put my figure on it, but something just wasn't right.
>Dante: And you figured it out?
>Randal: The first Death Star was manned by the Imperial Army. The only people onboard were stormtroppers, dignitaries, Imperials.
>Dante: Basically.
>Randal: So, when the blew it up, no problem. Evil's punished.
>Dante: And the second time around?
>Randal: The second time around, it wasn't even done being built yet. It was still under construction.
>Dante: So?
>Randal: So, construction job of that magnitude would require a helluva lot more manpower than the Imperial army had to offer. I'll bet there were independent contractors working on that thing: plumbers, aluminum siders, roofers.
>Dante: Not just Imperials, is what you're getting at?
>Randal: Exactly. In order to get it built quickly and quietly they'd hire anybody who could do the job. Do you think the average storm trooper knows how to install a toilet main? All they know is killing and white uniforms.
>Dante: All right, so they bring in independent contractors. Why are you so upset with its destruction?
>Randal: All those innocent contractors hired to do a job were killed! Casualties of a war they had nothing to do with. All right, look, you're a roofer, and some juicy government contract comes your way; you got the wife and kids and the two-story in suburbia - this is a government contract, which means all sorts of benefits. All of a sudden these left-wing militants blast you with lasers and wipe out everyone within a three-mile radius. You didn't ask for that. You have no personal politics. You're just trying to scrape out a living.
I mean there's an interesting question here because if (hypothetically) someone takes what is in their mind a moral high road and says "I will never hire an ex-NSA coder or sysadmin" then hopefully that person doesn't work for Facebook or Google, because really the difference isn't a matter of kind as much as degree, malware notwithstanding.