Live data from Hacker News

Craigslist Is Ugly, Janky, Old School, and Unbeatable

backchannel.com

61–70 of 162 posts

Re: Craigslist Is Ugly, Janky, Old School, and Unbeatable

#61
post #6

But you still can't search remote jobs, or any jobs without specifying exact town...

I don't get why you can't search for anything across the towns. If I'm looking for something hard to find but is reasonably shippable, I might want to take the risk of a trusting the seller or work out some escrow type thing.

They have taken the explicit view that Craigslist is a local service. Providing cross-city functionality would undermine that view.

Re: Craigslist Is Ugly, Janky, Old School, and Unbeatable

#62

The main problem Craigslist still has is that it does not have an official mobile app which is actually why I started using a competitors service. It's a lot easier on a phone to endlessly scroll through items via an app then it is to go to the CL website. CL is fine when I'm sitting down in front of a computer but if I'm on the bus I want to just be able to use my thumb to quickly flip through.

The main problem craigslist has is that it has no interest in getting any better, the lack of mobile app is a symptom of that.

They didn't even have a map on their real estate listings for a long time, which is ridiculous.

I do my best to use any craigslist alternative available first these days. LetGo was good for me.

Re: Craigslist Is Ugly, Janky, Old School, and Unbeatable

#63
Am I the only one who doesn't think Craigslist is "Ugly or Janky"? It's one of the only places left on the web where I can go and not be bombarded by ads, pop ups, crazy amount of JavaScript and slow loading. It just works and is intuitive to use. The only major thing I feel is missing is the ability to search through multiple locations at the same time.

Re: Craigslist Is Ugly, Janky, Old School, and Unbeatable

#64
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Craigslist has nearly $300 million in profit and only around 30 employees. Why on earth would they ever want to go public?

Public stock is much more liquid.

Stock doesn't matter if you can just toss employees cash whenever you want.

Re: Craigslist Is Ugly, Janky, Old School, and Unbeatable

#65
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Craigslist has nearly $300 million in profit and only around 30 employees. Why on earth would they ever want to go public?

Public stock is much more liquid.

Unlike those fat stacks of cash in their bank account.

Re: Craigslist Is Ugly, Janky, Old School, and Unbeatable

#66
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or perhaps Craig simply understands his business better than you do. Are the loudest users the ones providing him with the most profit? If not, then why not ignore them? Would being involved as a true middleman leave them more open to liability when things go south? If so, why open yourself to that risk if you are already making profit? If you really think CL is so under-utilized, why hasn't a larger company bought t…

Take a look at Ebay's acquisition attempt on CL. CL wasn't interested. Also, it's not about listening to loud users. It's about understanding whether your users (any of them) are willing to pay you to improve the site. And, the answer to that is a resounding yes.

If no one has unseated CL yet, isn't the answer a resounding no?

Re: Craigslist Is Ugly, Janky, Old School, and Unbeatable

#67
Great in major metro cities where internet use and penetration are almost taken for granted. I think the Dallas CL is just as lively as the SF one for instance. However, in a city like San Antonio, which I kid about being "40 years in the past," it's barely worth even looking. Very drastic difference in the community approaches. As in, the Dallas Music Instruments section might get 4 pages a day in volume. San Antonio might do 4 pages a month.

Re: Craigslist Is Ugly, Janky, Old School, and Unbeatable

#68
post #23

Network effect, reliability, free, anonymous, ability to run without JavaScript. If Craigslist decided to modernize today, they could potentially disrupt the state of things on the internet. Facebook is trying to move in on their territory for sure. Unfortunately, I don't think they will. If a new-kid-on-the-block could offer anonymity, reliability, and free regional market based transactions, with preferably integra…

>Facebook is trying to move in on their territory for sure. Unfortunately, I don't think they will. Why "unfortunately"? This is a good thing. Facebook is horrible, in many different ways, and the last thing we need is to hand even more power over the internet to them. CL is "ugly", but it's fast and works great, and isn't filled with ads and tracking, something I definitely can't say about Facebook.

Real competition in general is good, it'd force both products to improve.

Re: Craigslist Is Ugly, Janky, Old School, and Unbeatable

#69
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't get why you can't search for anything across the towns. If I'm looking for something hard to find but is reasonably shippable, I might want to take the risk of a trusting the seller or work out some escrow type thing.

They have taken the explicit view that Craigslist is a local service. Providing cross-city functionality would undermine that view.

I actually live between three of the cities listed in my area, they're all about 20 miles from my house and part of the same metropolitan statistical area. Being able to search LA and SF at the same time might be silly, but being able to search two or three very close cities is not IMO.
Post reply on HN