Live data from Hacker News

Alphabet Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2016 Results

abc.xyz

61–70 of 105 posts

Re: Alphabet Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2016 Results

#61

This was due to a one time tax hit. >Alphabet was forced to swallow a $586 million tax charge on the non-GAAP line related to its stock-based compensation, costing the company about 83 cents a share — the difference between a substantial earnings miss and a huge beat. >The tax charge is the result of a rule change in the U.S. targeting companies’ use of stock-based compensation to sweeten their adjusted earnings numb…

> This was due to a one time tax hit

Was it a one-time hit or is this the new normal for stock-based compensation (SBC)?

Re: Alphabet Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2016 Results

#63

Are we not going to talk about the fact that they are on abc.xyz? I think it's hilarious.

It's fun to have your own extension, isn't it? then you can host http://hooli.xyz as well, which is good fun too (It's the parody website of the equivalent of Google in the TV show "Silicon Valley", which in itself is a good amount of self-irony).

Re: Alphabet Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2016 Results

#65
post #57
post #17

Revenue is up 22% but EPS is up only 7%. I would normally expect Google's EPS growth to be higher than revenue growth. Where are they spending all that extra income?

They did increase headcount by more than 10k (from ~62k to ~72k). Headcount tends to produce more revenue eventually, but there's a lag. Staffing up by that much indicates that they're predicting significant growth.

(I'm an employee, with clear biases)

Precisely this. Large scale infrastructure growth also costs quite a bit, especially when you pay for your own network and other works in progress https://cloud.google.com/about/locations/

Re: Alphabet Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2016 Results

#67
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

..and yet, TV advertising is still a huge business YouTube can target ads much better than TV, and with TrueView ads the advertiser only pays if the viewer doesn't skip, so more of the revenue is going to be coming from ads that mutually add value (at least that's the theory)

I don't get TV ads either. What is the effectiveness of it?

Put crudely, name and brand recognition. People view familiar things more favorably than unfamiliar things. If you've heard of it, you are more likely to buy it. If it has been on TV a lot, you've heard of it -- even if you didn't like the ad.

There's a correlation between TV advertising and increased sales over the long term.

http://adage.com/article/media/study-affirms-long-term-sales...

(The favorability thing has been lab-tested by showing people subliminal adverts, among other things.)

Re: Alphabet Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2016 Results

#68
post #64

Is there some way to see how well Google Fiber is doing? It's really worrying that they seem to be slowing it down. Without such disruption and newly corrupted FCC, we might be entering pretty bad times for the ISP users.

I guess you missed the news: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/10/googl...

Re: Alphabet Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2016 Results

#69

Interesting the effective tax rate went from 5% last year to 22% this year. What would cause that?

Someone else will have to explain what on earth it means, but last year's press release said > For Q4 2015, our effective tax rate reflects impact of certain one-time items in the U.S., specifically the resolution of a multi-year audit with an ETR impact of 9%, as well as the full year impact of the R&D tax credit with an ETR impact of 8%. https://abc.xyz/investor/news/earnings/2015/Q4_google_earnin...

ETR = effective tax rate.

Re: Alphabet Announces Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2016 Results

#70
post #68
post #64

Is there some way to see how well Google Fiber is doing? It's really worrying that they seem to be slowing it down. Without such disruption and newly corrupted FCC, we might be entering pretty bad times for the ISP users.

I guess you missed the news: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/10/googl...

I didn't miss it. But it doesn't provide any financial info. And quotes like "Larry Page got tired of it" which were floating around the time that article came out, weren't really helpful. What I want to understand, is Google Fiber profitable or not? Just being "tired" because it grows slower than they expected, isn't a good reason to gut it.
Post reply on HN