Re: Whatup #61 Post by chris_wot » Sat, Apr 23, 2016, 2:35 AM UTC kornish wrote: post #57 Bummer, looks like they took it down. Thank goodness for the Wayback Machine!
Re: Whatup #62 Post by chris_wot » Sat, Apr 23, 2016, 4:52 PM UTC capote wrote: post #58 chris_wot wrote: post #46 Earlier quoted context omitted. It seems like it's not really all that interesting... Did you really need someone to explain the purpose of a file called test .html? Seems like the filename explains it. Why is that so interesting?
Re: Whatup #63 Post by capote » Sat, Apr 23, 2016, 7:00 PM UTC chris_wot wrote: post #62 capote wrote: post #58 Earlier quoted context omitted. Did you really need someone to explain the purpose of a file called test .html? Seems like the filename explains it. Why is that so interesting? Why does it matter how interesting it is? It's humorous and we had some fun with it.
Re: Whatup #64 Post by mpnordland » Mon, Apr 25, 2016, 12:41 PM UTC chris_wot wrote: post #55 mpnordland wrote: post #51 Earlier quoted context omitted. Seems like it's working to me, what do you mean by offline? And all of a sudden the FBI has a lot of IP addresses to follow-up... I should note that I did alert the sysadmin and he told me he was taking it down and would figure out how to secure it.
Re: Whatup #65 Post by chris_wot » Fri, Apr 29, 2016, 6:04 PM UTC capote wrote: post #63 chris_wot wrote: post #62 Earlier quoted context omitted. Why is that so interesting? Why does it matter how interesting it is? It's humorous and we had some fun with it. You just answered my question. Cheers.