Previous unmasking (without naming him) based on screenshots from his account: https://syrah.co/joshdickson40/5604e5e10fc1786b0152a51a
So was he right?
Unmasking Startup L. Jackson
61–70 of 95 posts
Re: Unmasking Startup L. Jackson
#62I've found @DEVOPS_BORAT to be funny too. Kept seeing his tweets for over a year or two; humorous ones about devops, from an imaginary Armenian devops guy with broken English. Seems to have stopped tweeting a while ago.
since this has devolved into everyone's favorite tech-related parody accounts, i'll throw https://twitter.com/iamdevloper and https://twitter.com/NeckbeardHacker into the mix.
Re: Unmasking Startup L. Jackson
#63I've found @DEVOPS_BORAT to be funny too. Kept seeing his tweets for over a year or two; humorous ones about devops, from an imaginary Armenian devops guy with broken English. Seems to have stopped tweeting a while ago.
since this has devolved into everyone's favorite tech-related parody accounts, i'll throw https://twitter.com/iamdevloper and https://twitter.com/NeckbeardHacker into the mix.
Re: Unmasking Startup L. Jackson
#64Have to be honest, I'm surprised how little effort it took to 'unmask' him. Usually when people try and find out the actual identities of anonymous internet celebrities, it becomes a sort of investigation where they have to put all the pieces together. But that doesn't seem to be the case here, unless the story is missing a few steps.
Re: Unmasking Startup L. Jackson
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
So was he right?
Yeah, I'm surprised by how many people still ask me this. There's proof in the piece, but I also write long so I don't blame you if you missed it :)
Re: Unmasking Startup L. Jackson
#66Re: Unmasking Startup L. Jackson
#67Have to be honest, I'm surprised how little effort it took to 'unmask' him. Usually when people try and find out the actual identities of anonymous internet celebrities, it becomes a sort of investigation where they have to put all the pieces together. But that doesn't seem to be the case here, unless the story is missing a few steps.
The story is missing a few steps.
Re: Unmasking Startup L. Jackson
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, I'm surprised by how many people still ask me this. There's proof in the piece, but I also write long so I don't blame you if you missed it :)
Your blog post which I assume is connected to aproduct would have gotten a lot more traction is you had actually outed him.
I somewhat regret the appearance of a conflict of interest on my part there (that would not have been present if I had put it on Medium, for instance), because it really did look like a growth hack on my part, and I can't stand when people do things like this for traffic. It was certainly nice to see the traffic, but that's not why I did it.
Syrah - the site that it's on - was sort of an engineering proof of concept for me. I wanted to design something a little like Medium so I could better understand what was involved, and that's what it is. It was a pretty major effort to do it all on my own and I definitely learned a lot. I wanted to take that experience and use it for another, much larger project, where we built a CMS that could power websites, apps, etc, and let people white label it for their own use (sorta think Wordpress, but for more than just websites). Ultimately YC didn't take us and I ended up falling into another project that I'm working on now. I'd love to revisit someday, but for now, I just use Syrah to write things because I put so much time and love into it. Sometimes they are large (I broke a lot of the Tango issues: https://syrah.co/joshdickson40/565f62f40eaac8b79f519b17), sometimes they are not (https://syrah.co/joshdickson40/56aead844b23e3498c0392a1).
Re: Unmasking Startup L. Jackson
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also, @fart (aka Jon Hendren) pulled off one of the best examples of trolling the media I've ever seen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WqCj_3U0Lc
Isn't he the dude that trolled himself with the 'Smashmouth eat the eggs' thing and the consequences thereof.