Live data from Hacker News

In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?

newyorker.com

61–70 of 114 posts

Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?

#61
post #60

I wouldn't write those professionals off so easily. People barely knows AlphaGo until now. Once they start learning about AlphaGo's behaviors, they may be able to come out with new tactics. No doubt it will be a collective effort from the Go community, no one can beat the machine alone.

It's true that humans should be allowed a rematch. And all professionals Go players could be playing in concert.

Hell, Google should organize a "AlphaGo against the world" on internet.

Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?

#62
post #15
post #5

I mean, that's like asking whether marathon runners have a future now that we've got cars. Exercising one's brain/having pleasure through the game could be an end in itself, and is independent of how machines perform.

I like that analogy a lot! It's not like "playing Go really well" ever solved any real-world problem, it has always been a competition among humans. What should change, there?

If you like it a lot, let's make sure we credit Michael Redmond who said it last night during the Go match: https://youtu.be/qUAmTYHEyM8?t=3713

Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?

#63
I would think this has to be a serious inflection point... As far learning how to think, strategize, competing with friends, etc go will remain. However for the extremely few say 100 really top level players, this has to in a way be disheartening... at that level its about competition, and the will, discipline and ability to advance... it has to be disheartening to know you will never be the best.

Its kind of like climbing mount Everest 'because it was there'. Its just not 'there' anymore.

Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?

#64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Kind of cool to know (if you're Lee) that your thinking ability is on par with 1920 CPUs and 280 GPUs!

Well, the whole point of this match has been to demonstrate that it is not...

Flip it around: it took 1920 CPUs and 280 GPUs to beat him!

I'd be ecstatic if I could keep GNU Go on 1 CPU from wiping the floor with me... :)

Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?

#65
post #45
post #5

I mean, that's like asking whether marathon runners have a future now that we've got cars. Exercising one's brain/having pleasure through the game could be an end in itself, and is independent of how machines perform.

Man it would have been great to live at the time of horse races.

???

Is this Poe's Law in action?

Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?

#66
post #38

Well, absolutely, if they're talking about Golang that is. In all seriousness, a computer did fairly well on Jeopardy some years back, and we're still watching the game show as it's still quite relevant.

And a trained human + computer with internet access (Google search!) could beat the best humans in Jeopardy for quite a while now.

Not really. Jeopardy is all about buzzer timing[0]. With Google search, you're always going to be slow on the buzzer. That's okay, though. The actual trivia is pretty easy. It's designed this way to be accessible to the average TV viewer.

[0] http://www.pisspoor.com/buzzer.html

Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?

#68
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What kind of configuration would you need to run the DeepMind setup? Looking at the wikipedia page if we assume the setup [1] there then it seems like at this time it would be out of the realm of feasibility at this time of setting up this software for cheating. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlphaGo#Hardware

Google's infrastructure gives it an extra boost, but even the single machine version can beat the distributed version 25% of the time.[1] [1] https://twitter.com/demishassabis/status/708489093676568576

The nice thing about most of this deep learning stuff is that you can use a million machine hours to train your model, and almost no time to make an evaluation. So the single machine version has all of the pattern recognition given to it by the cluster, but a few ply less tree search depth.

So to me this underscores the relative importance of the deep learning model vs the tree search.

Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?

#69
post #15
post #5

I mean, that's like asking whether marathon runners have a future now that we've got cars. Exercising one's brain/having pleasure through the game could be an end in itself, and is independent of how machines perform.

I like that analogy a lot! It's not like "playing Go really well" ever solved any real-world problem, it has always been a competition among humans. What should change, there?

No one will ever collect $200 dollars again

Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?

#70
post #63

I would think this has to be a serious inflection point... As far learning how to think, strategize, competing with friends, etc go will remain. However for the extremely few say 100 really top level players, this has to in a way be disheartening... at that level its about competition, and the will, discipline and ability to advance... it has to be disheartening to know you will never be the best. Its kind of like cl…

It'd be like climbing Everest on foot in the shadow of a cable car which runs to the top. Still a clallenge, but one that feels pointless.
Post reply on HN