There is a radio program in the UK called More or Less, who''s (whom's?) motto is "Correlation is not causation". Admittedly, I have neither read the paper, nor did I fully understand the section on proving the direction of influence, but I can't help but feel this research makes pretty poor use of statistics and logic, however much I wish to believe the result. Is all nutritional research this bad?
You haven't read the original paper, don't even understand the methodology they used to reach their conclusions and yet you "can't help but feel this research makes pretty poor use of statistics and logic"? It seems something is bad here, but I don't think it's the nutritional research. If you can't be bothered to actually read the paper, why do you think you're able to critique it?
Eating chocolate is associated with improved brain function
61–70 of 101 posts
Re: Eating chocolate is associated with improved brain function
#62Food companies distort nutrition science by funding studies. That's why we have very specific titles like "Concord grape juice, cognitive function, and driving performance," or, "Walnut ingestion in adults at risk for diabetes." Usually the results are positive. http://www.vox.com/2016/3/3/11148422/food-science-nutrition-...
Now, there are other problems with that sort of data-mining and determining whether they've successfully avoided them all is highly nontrivial (and I haven't tried). So this might still be bad science. But it doesn't appear to be funded-by-vested-interests bad.
Re: Eating chocolate is associated with improved brain function
#63Re: Eating chocolate is associated with improved brain function
#64Just as an FYI, I found a company recently that makes chocolate with zeor sugar, that's sweetened with Stevia: https://www.cocopolo.com/ I didn't like their dark chocolate, but their milk chocolate comes pretty close to regular milk chocolate.
What is this current obsession with stevia? It has a very strong, pretty much unpalatable taste that even strong espresso can't mask.
Re: Eating chocolate is associated with improved brain function
#65Re: Eating chocolate is associated with improved brain function
#66Re: Eating chocolate is associated with improved brain function
#67Re: Eating chocolate is associated with improved brain function
#68All food is healthy. Diets can be unhealthy. It really is interesting that the whole science is concentrating on a single ingredient.
Re: Eating chocolate is associated with improved brain function
#69I long for the day when these correlation-digging studies with absurd claims will stop. https://xkcd.com/882/
Re: Eating chocolate is associated with improved brain function
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
>otherwise it tastes horrible; try raw cacao Every luxury food or drug tastes horrible until you've learnt to enjoy it. Remember your first beer or coffee? My guess is sugar would initially taste somewhat foul ('sickly sweet') if one was brought up without it. EDIT: I'm not recommending that people start snorting or imbibing cocoa powder. However I think that if this were the only form of chocolate then one would qui…
From my personal experience, I have to agree with wapapaloobop. I put a spoon of raw cacao in my morning coffee, because I love the taste. However I drink (and eat no) sugar whatsoever and found the taste disgusting (in the sense of spitting it out) when I accidentally drank from my girlfriends coffee some time ago.
I wonder if it is learned or if people who like sweets have different taste buds than those who do not. I also like really hoppy beer and bitter candy.