Live data from Hacker News

Google Jibe: Better carrier messaging for everyone

jibe.google.com

61–69 of 69 posts

Re: Google Jibe: Better carrier messaging for everyone

#61
post #50
post #7

Ick. I wish we could kill SMS/Whatsapp/Wechat/LINE already and just do everything over e-mail or some other cross-platform, multi-login protocol. I hate being tied up to one device to message people. I change devices on the order of minutes, move over the course of a day between a few locations that all have devices I own, and don't regularly carry or look at my cell phone if I am already staring at something bigger…

"I wish we could kill SMS/Whatsapp/Wechat/LINE already and just do everything over e-mail or some other cross-platform, multi-login protocol." That's an workable idea. What's needed first is to improve the transmission speed of short emails. I was once considering writing a mail forwarder for servers that don't have mailboxes, one that would open an outbound SMTP connection to the destination host before closing the…

Too bad too many systems implement various delays in the mail protocol. Such as greylisting which would defeat your forward instantly :/

Re: Google Jibe: Better carrier messaging for everyone

#62
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"I wish we could kill SMS/Whatsapp/Wechat/LINE already and just do everything over e-mail or some other cross-platform, multi-login protocol." That's an workable idea. What's needed first is to improve the transmission speed of short emails. I was once considering writing a mail forwarder for servers that don't have mailboxes, one that would open an outbound SMTP connection to the destination host before closing the…

Too bad too many systems implement various delays in the mail protocol. Such as greylisting which would defeat your forward instantly :/

Good project for someone: measure mail propagation delays through various services.

Re: Google Jibe: Better carrier messaging for everyone

#63

all of the messaging apps WhatsApp, LINE, WeChat etc are terrible in that they owe a lot of their rise due to users lack of comprehension of sms vs IP and carrier lockin etc etc. However - google and messaging is just a messy, and they're pushing this now? How about sort out your Messenger and Hangouts mess and get all of that consolidated

More likely, they owe their rise to lack of an account creation process (no username and password).

Re: Google Jibe: Better carrier messaging for everyone

#65
post #60
post #10

Anybody have a good source on what the heck RCS is? I've never heard of it until now. I will google also, but I bet someone knows of an introduction they'd recommend.

RCS is the legacy telcos ongoing attempt to try to somehow get into the messaging game that all of the Internet-based communications app are doing (WhatsApp, FB Messenger, Line, Kik, Skype, iMessage, etc.). Basically, they'd like all their SMS revenue back! Dean Bubley had a great analysis - "Google + GSMA announcement on RCS is no gamechanger" : http://disruptivewireless.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/google-gsma...

> Basically, they'd like all their SMS revenue back!

Great! Because I'd like an open platform back such that SMS offers, unlike every messaging platform you mentioned.

Re: Google Jibe: Better carrier messaging for everyone

#66
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"I wish we could kill SMS/Whatsapp/Wechat/LINE already and just do everything over e-mail or some other cross-platform, multi-login protocol." That's an workable idea. What's needed first is to improve the transmission speed of short emails. I was once considering writing a mail forwarder for servers that don't have mailboxes, one that would open an outbound SMTP connection to the destination host before closing the…

Too bad too many systems implement various delays in the mail protocol. Such as greylisting which would defeat your forward instantly :/

Greylisting kicks in only the first time; once a "channel" has been established and the participants send messages back and forth they should be on each other's whitelist

Re: Google Jibe: Better carrier messaging for everyone

#67
post #30
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here's irony for you: basic text messaging is almost free to the carriers, because it actually happens on the cellular protocol's control channel. [1] Your phone maintains that connection persistently (I think), so fitting SMS messages into idle time makes it virtually free. The SMS cost is just a profit center for carriers, but this explanation also accounts for the speed of delivery, etc. > Look at what happens to…

1 - yes that is a major issue with SMS and why SMS use is in such sharp decline. I doubt the carriers will make the mistake of pricing RCS like SMS or they'll never get to break into messaging again. 2 - the iMessage to Android experience is still broken in many other ways. For instance if you were in any long-running group messages that were iMessages, your messages will be silently dropped until the thread is re-cr…

2 - That sounds 100% expected. There is no such thing as a group message between iMessage and SMS/MMS. That is readily apparent the moment someone adds a non-iMessage identifier to a new group message. You're asking that the group iMessage experience degrade because you left. That sounds selfish to me.

Re: Google Jibe: Better carrier messaging for everyone

#68
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"I wish we could kill SMS/Whatsapp/Wechat/LINE already and just do everything over e-mail or some other cross-platform, multi-login protocol." That's an workable idea. What's needed first is to improve the transmission speed of short emails. I was once considering writing a mail forwarder for servers that don't have mailboxes, one that would open an outbound SMTP connection to the destination host before closing the…

I love this idea, thanks for sharing.

This could work really well with minor fixes. There are additional "enhanced status codes" available for SMTP that aren't used much. IMAP servers could return a new status such as "2.2.5", with meaning "Delivered, recipient notified". That would indicate an active NOTIFY connection between IMAP client and server. That means the client is listening right now and will display the message.

With "forward while connection is open" mail forwarders, that code would be passed back to the originating SMTP sender, which can then display an indicator in the bubble that the message has made it all the way to the recipient's device.

Now it looks just like messaging, but works over email infrastructure.

Re: Google Jibe: Better carrier messaging for everyone

#69
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

hangouts does everything BUT this. The UI shows several user accounts that you have to keep switching. it is a total nightmare. then, the worst offense, you have absolutely no idea if you send a message to someone, if it will go via hangouts http IM message or via SMS. you have zero control/feedback from the UI. The ONLY way to know, is to create contacts with just email address and others with just phone numbers. an…

When I'm using it I have a drop down next to where I send the message that lets me select sms or hangouts that seems to work as expected. I can choose which number to send to or to send a hangout. Maybe it's been a while since you tried it? I vaguely remember having problems like that in the past. I respect your opinion about separate apps for sms/messages, but I personally don't believe that was the right choice. I…

nope. have to use it daily as my main number is gVoice. sadly.

no dropdown whatsoever. Also to dial via gvoice you need a hangouts dialer addon, and everytime you last selected sms on hagouts and select to dial with the dialer addon, it complains that the sms account can't dial.

it's a train wreak.

Post reply on HN