Live data from Hacker News

How to Replace IMAP

gaborcselle.com

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: How to Replace IMAP

#61
post #3

I can't say whether his implementation makes sense. Regardless, I would like to see public key encryption of all email. There's no reason why messages should be plain text anywhere except at the two ends. I realize key management would be a problem, but it's probably a solvable problem. The solution would have to allow most people to be practically unaware of encryption issues.

Encryption of all email would make intermediary virus scanning impossible and spam scanning next to impossible.

Wouldn't it make spam impractical because you would all of a sudden need much more processing power to encrypt the messages (especially millions of them)?

Re: How to Replace IMAP

#62

My responses to your Design Outline. 1. I'm not convinced that http/https is the best protocol. I agree that it's the defacto standard, but if you're going to go through this, there might be a better way. (Push, in particular, is a problem). 2. Stateless is wonderful, agreed. 3. I agree with JSON over XML, but what about binary data? That is the weakest part of JSON, in my opinion. 4. I like where you're going with t…

> 3. I agree with JSON over XML, but what about binary data? That is the weakest part of JSON, in my opinion.

Maybe BSON?: http://www.mongodb.org/display/DOCS/BSON

Post reply on HN