Live data from Hacker News

ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

techcrunch.com

61–70 of 88 posts

Re: ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

#61
post #60
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

of course we don't deploy a network accounting for every machine at 200mb/s flat 24/24, this would just be throwing money away. The reality is that most users won't be using these 200mb/s constantly, every customer have different traffic pattern usages. We (online.net) have a long history in dedicated servers (yes we have a >1tb/s global network footprint), we known how to scale the network the proper way. It is care…

Do you mean the 1Gbps port for the enclosure (i.e. the server hosting the 912 blades)? If so, unless you're providing many 1Gbps links you're not anywhere close to providing good quality networking for these

every internal links (between blades, chassis and backbone) are x*10gb/s :) server to switch is 1gb/s dedicated

Re: ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

#64
post #15

Nitpicking the submission title ("ARM7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month"): ARM7 is actually very old ARM cores running ARMv4; these servers are ARMv7.

To be even more specific, these CPU are produced by Marvell under the name Armada 370/XP (according /proc/cpuinfo), and are based on ARM's Cortex A9 design (source: https://scaleway.com/faq/server/#-Why-did-you-choose-ARM ).

Re: ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

#65
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

~# fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=16 --size=4G --readwrite=randread test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=17457: Thu Sep 3 12:39:10 2015 read : io=0B, bw=115612KB/s, iops=28903, runt= 36279msec cpu : usr=17.12%, sys=67.12%, ctx=35506, majf=0, minf=39 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=100.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0% submit : 0=0.0%…

Officially they provide 2000 read/write IOPS for a volume composed of one chunk (50GB) [1]. You measured 4000 r/w IOPS, so does this mean you ran it on a 100GB volume? If yes, then that's pretty amazing you get exactly the expected allocated IOPS performance for a $3.40/mo server. [1] https://www.scaleway.com/faq/server/

I'm on a 50GB volume :)

Re: ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

#66
post #44

I've just signed up for one of these instances - here are some speed tests/stats/details, if anyone's interested: https://gist.github.com/JosephRedfern/57c81ac95bf4f1175e3e If you'd like anything in particular running, let me know and I shall oblige when I can!

Hi, can you please run the following two fio tests: #Random write fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=128 --size=4G --readwrite=randwrite #Random Read fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=128 --size=4G --readwrite=randread

[deleted]

Re: ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

#67

A huge part of the monthly cost of any infrastructure is less about power and the hardware and more about the quality of the internet connection. If I can't get data in and out quickly it isn't going to be much good to me.

Scaleway is part of the Iliad group, the third French ISP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iliad_SA

No need to worry about our infrastructure. Our datacenters are well connected: http://www.iliad-datacenter.fr/infrastructure/connectivite

Re: ARMv7 dedicated servers for 3.40 per month

#68
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hi, can you please run the following two fio tests: #Random write fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=128 --size=4G --readwrite=randwrite #Random Read fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=128 --size=4G --readwrite=randread

~# fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=16 --size=4G --readwrite=randread test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=17457: Thu Sep 3 12:39:10 2015 read : io=0B, bw=115612KB/s, iops=28903, runt= 36279msec cpu : usr=17.12%, sys=67.12%, ctx=35506, majf=0, minf=39 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=100.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0% submit : 0=0.0%…

Can confirm that my 50GB box is giving almost identical numbers.
Post reply on HN