Live data from Hacker News

4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches

bbc.com

591–600 of 936 posts

Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches

#591

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Ofcom really thinks that their laws apply globally. How silly of them. Obviously, only the US jurisdiction can do that.

Ofcom could do it too if they had like 25 aircraft carriers and 2 of the 3 largest air forces on the planet, the best intel network, the most advanced tools, the backing of a $25T economy, the…

Might makes right I guess.

Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches

#592

Ofcom is currently threatening a Canadian forum that exists to help people with depression. Ofcom claims that geoblocking blocking the UK is "insufficient": > I've also gone back to Ofcom explicitly telling them the UK was now geoblocked (twice now) and I received a response that this was insufficient. Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1rk690v/i_ru... Ofcom really thinks that their laws apply gl…

These are the "duties" Ofcom is demanding of site owners and operators:

  - to conduct a suitable and sufficient illegal content risk assessment;
  - to use proportionate measures to prevent individuals encountering priority illegal content;
  - to use proportionate systems and processes to minimise the length of time priority illegal content is present;
  - to swiftly take down illegal content when it becomes aware of it;
  - to specify in its terms of service how individuals are to be protected from illegal content; and relating to content reporting and complaints procedures in relation to illegal content.
Reads to me like they're legally prescribing that all web content is to be automatically fed into AI models in order to assess the content's appropriateness and "risk", and then "swiftly" censor the content if it's deemed too risky or illegal.

That's the only method that will scale, can be done "swiftly" and won't have the government kicking down your door if someone posts something illegal on your platform while you're sleeping or on vacation.

Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches

#593

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you have children?

I do. I also grew up on 4chan because I didn’t have an involved parent, and I lived in the suburbs where finding friends to just “go outside and play” wasn’t an option. Consuming that content was genuinely hurtful and probably forever altered my psyche. I have the means and knowledge, in technical skill and life experience, to know how these things work, and protect my kids from that. Most people don’t.

4chan was pretty cool, one of the best sites there ever was. It has had the most impact on the internet. Reddit is basically few guys wanting to make money off of a PC 4chan, and we know the impact Reddit has. The content Reddit had for YEARS was basically recycled 4chan, the topics of certain subreddits were totally inherited from 4chan boards, while losing the main cool thing about 4chan, anonymity.

Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches

#594

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a meaningless standard since anyone can claim they were alarmed or distressed and there's no way to invalidate such a subjective claim. I can say I'm alarmed by your comment, does that mean it's valid for Ofcom to fine you?

Again, that's not what the law states. The law is not broken when someone is alarmed or distressed by a comment. The law is broken if you post something that is "likely or intending to" which is not judged by the victim. If you walk into a police station in England and tell them that this comment on Hacker News alarmed and distressed you, it doesn't matter, it is up to the legal system to judge my intent, i.e: whethe…

Wait so your saying he's actually correct? That's absolutely insane.

Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches

#595
post #551

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Love contrasting this post with Americans' reactions when they're presented with a GDPR cookie banner.

Those cookie banners shouldn’t be presented to Americans.

Why shouldn’t they? Or do you mean it is not required for US citizens?

Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches

#596

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The same principles apply around the world. The U.S. recently invaded a sovereign nation and abducted its democratically elected leader because that leader was ostensibly involved in shipping cocaine to the U.S. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_United_States_interventio...

So what? The only reason the U.S. did this is because it can. What will the UK do when 4chan tells its online regulator to go suck a d***, send in James Bond?

> What will the UK do when 4chan tells its online regulator to go suck a d**, send in James Bond?

Let's say they did. Would you be saying "So what?" then too?

Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches

#597
post #560

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not exactly. It’s like fining Parisian bars to hand over alcohol to couriers without checking to whom couriers will deliver it. Couriers = all involved network providers.

The Parisian bars are the ones writing the address on the package not the courier.

When DoorDash or whatever courier comes to a restaurant, they pick up “order number”. That order number is in essence just private IP. Courier translates it to address=public ip.

It follows that the restaurant writes the address on every delivery. Do they ID each recipient?

Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches

#598
post #82

If it wasn't for 4Chan, we might never have solved the Haruhi problem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superpermutation#Lower_bounds,... I used to go on a curated version of 4Chan via Telegram. Yes there is a lot of racism (although it flies in every direction, between every ethnicity you could imagine) but there is also (due to the anonymous nature) some genuinely interesting discussions. I remember one thread about ai…

>There was a guy in Greece who had found out that as long as he never graduated, he could live a basic life for free at university. I remember him. Sadly he got evicted in the end. F.

Unless it was someone else larping as him, as recent as feb this year he posted that he's still living there (apparently got an extension or something). He was arrested, but he got released within a few days.

Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches

#599

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Their cultural decline seems to have definitely accelerated recently. Even 10-15 years ago it seemed like there was so much more British influence in the media, a lot more films and television set in Britain. It seems like the London Olympics were a kind of last hurrah. Even here in Australia which has always historically had more British influence than anywhere else it's receded - there's very little focus on their…

it's ironic though, that you wrote your comment in English.

That is only historic influence, though. Britain does not control the English language and cannot exert any further influence through it.

Re: 4Chan mocks £520k fine for UK online safety breaches

#600

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ofcom could do it too if they had like 25 aircraft carriers and 2 of the 3 largest air forces on the planet, the best intel network, the most advanced tools, the backing of a $25T economy, the…

Might makes right I guess.

US is losing a war on washing, hardly fear inducing

https://www.irishtimes.com/world/middle-east/2026/03/18/bloc...

Post reply on HN