Live data from Hacker News

FedNow Is Live

federalreserve.gov

591–600 of 1001 posts

Re: FedNow Is Live

#591

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm sure British loyalists circa 1776 would have agreed with you.

Nonsense comparison. We're talking about business partnerships. If everyone with a shred of decency turns your organization away, that's a great litmus test for its existence. Worry about the next revolution being banked when that becomes a real concern, not over an online troll farm that tries to convince vulnerable people to end their lives.

Just like how Ellen Degeneres was deplatformed in 1997 for being undecent. Great point!

Re: FedNow Is Live

#592
post #305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does this end the T + 2day ridiculousness? It should be T + 1millisecond at worst. What does it take to update 2 "balance" values in databases?

The problem is, which "database"? If you know the data is always going to be in the range of ~1TB, use Postgres or some other ACID database. But I don't know of any petabyte scale ACID compliant database. Also I'm not sure if ACID is sufficient or not for banking systems.

Generally speaking, you won't find financial institutions using Postgres for core line of business databases.

Re: FedNow Is Live

#593

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the most hacker news conversation ever.

Yeah like who the f*ck cares if their bank transfer takes 1 second or 1 millisecond.

Retail High-Frequency Trading.

Maybe I should delete this comment before someone gets an idea and starts selling their get rich quick course.

Re: FedNow Is Live

#594

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you under the impression that ACH, the thing FedNow is replacing, is free from government influence? This is what's bizarre to me about the FedNow hysteria. It's not a government system replacing a private market system. It's a government system replacing an older, worse government system. It's like having a panic attack because the Federal Reserve is updating their PCs to from Windows XP to Windows 10.

Because Nacha (and ACH) is explicitly not a government system

[deleted]

Re: FedNow Is Live

#595
post #548

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Credit card fees that aren’t passed through to you are a bit tragedy of the commons. Probably good for them to go away. It’s fine if you choose to pay them, and it’s still worth it to you, but otherwise you’re forcing everyone around you to subsidize your credit card rewards. That’s not fair.

Alternatively, everyone not taking advantage of the credit card protections isn't taking advantage of what's offered around them. Everyone should be subsidizing everyone else, because no one should be using a debit card to make direct consumer purchases in 2023. It's too fraught with risk comparatively, and even the scummiest of the sub-prime credit cards give you a grace period to not accrue interest.

> …isn't taking advantage of what's offered around them.

is that not an absurdly slippery slope?

what if rather than anyone having to take advantage of anything, things just worked better, and everyone agreed that such things matter?

Re: FedNow Is Live

#596
post #538

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Last time, a decade ago, I played with RabbitMQ and similar open source queue system they didn't handle congestion and rate limitation well (crashed). From my little experience with classical IBM systems like MQ they knew about that stuff.

I spent a couple years deploying and integrating IBM MQ, and I own a couple of services currently that interact with it. It was (just a couple years ago) and probably still is more robust than current open source solutions, as long as you weren't planning on forking the code for some very specific use case that requires heavy modification, or the more likely situation of just wanting to save money. As far as message…

can you please compare this IBM mainframe plus MQ stack with distributed and sufficiently redundant Kafka, for example?

Re: FedNow Is Live

#597
post #490

Earlier quoted context omitted.

certain design documents such as threat models aren't public That smells like security through obscurity (which admittedly is the status quo in the banking world). Contrasted to approaches like Bitcoin, for which full code and whitepaper are public, and which has managed to survive every attack vector thrown at it for the last decade and a half. Not arguing for Bitcoin as money here, just highlighting the diverse app…

LOL what? Keeping private keys private is not "security through obscurity". Or if it is then basically all security is security through obscurity. No one is posting their private keys on github, and when they do their crypto goes poof nearly instantly. None of the exchanges publish their threat model documents. I sure as shit don't tell people where I store my private keys. The bitcoin whitepaper and code are more an…

Non-sequitur. OP never said anything about posting private keys publicly.

They did talk about having the entire system's source code/design publicly available.

Re: FedNow Is Live

#598

> Banks and credit unions of all sizes can sign up and use this tool to instantly transfer money for their customers, any time of the day, on any day of the year. Whoa. Is this as awesome as it sounds? Is this akin to government-backed Venmo, or something?

> > Banks and credit unions of all sizes can sign up and use this tool to instantly transfer money for their customers, any time of the day, on any day of the year.

> Whoa. Is this as awesome as it sounds? Is this akin to government-backed Venmo, or something?

No, under the hood it's a government Blockchain

Re: FedNow Is Live

#599
post #15

> Banks and credit unions of all sizes can sign up and use this tool to instantly transfer money for their customers, any time of the day, on any day of the year. Whoa. Is this as awesome as it sounds? Is this akin to government-backed Venmo, or something?

> Is this akin to government-backed Venmo, or something? Yes, exactly. But you have to keep in mind that this is a two-edged sword. On the one hand, it's going to be convenient and probably secure. On the other hand, it's going to let the government see every transaction you make, which for some people will be a very high price to pay.

> > Is this akin to government-backed Venmo, or something?

> Yes, exactly. But you have to keep in mind that this is a two-edged sword. On the one hand, it's going to be convenient and probably secure. On the other hand, it's going to let the government see every transaction you make, which for some people will be a very high price to pay.

No, exactly wrong. It's a gov Blockchain

Re: FedNow Is Live

#600
post #486

For those curious, it is really using IBM MQ[1] under the hood and uses a bespoke flavor of the ISO 20022 specification. The FedNow Service itself is the tip of the iceberg in terms of what actually happens from an end-to-end perspective. We've been working to become a Certified Service Provider so feel free to ask me anything. I'm happy to share anything that is not under NDA. [1] https://www.ibm.com/products/mq

Is there anything special about the IBM MQ implementation which makes it worth naming them? It looks like you can connect to it using AMQP so I wonder why they wouldn't just say something generic like "MQ" or "AMQP protocol".

I mean it pre-dates probably every open source MQ implementation, for starters.
Post reply on HN